V. K. JADHAV, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V.K. Jadhav, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment & order of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon dated 22nd August, 2014 in Sessions Case No. 4 of 2013.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the prosecution case, are as under:-
Deceased-Aruna was the wife of appellant-accused. Accused was working as Watchman with D. Pharmacy College, Mahodarigaon, Tq. Sinnar, Dist. Nashik. Deceased-Aruna was working with Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation as ST Bus Conductor at Mandangad Depo, Dist. Ratnagiri. The marriage between the appellant-accused Vijay and the deceased-Aruna was solemnized on 11th March, 2012 at Rankhamb, Tq. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar. Incident had taken place on 28th June, 2012 between 08:00 to 08:30 pm. It is the case of the prosecution that from 26th June 2012 to 29th June, 2012 the deceased was assigned with the duty of conductor of ST bus having route from Mandangad to Shirdi. On 28th June, 2012 at about 01:30 pm, the said bus left for Pune and reached Shirdi at 07:00 pm. PW3 - Chandrakant Ashok Jawale was the driver of the said ST bus and deceased-Aruna was the conductor. Appellant-accused Vijay had been to Shirdi
Dhanaji Bhagwan Madne Vs. State of Maharashtra
Maruti Rama Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra (2003) 10 SCC 670
Prakash Vs. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Haryana Vs. Ram Singh
State of Punjab Vs. Karnail Singh
The prosecution must establish a conclusive chain of circumstantial evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The benefit of doubt must be given to the accused when the evidence does not concl....
The judgment emphasizes the high standard of proof required for convictions based on circumstantial evidence and the need for voluntary and credible extra-judicial confessions.
The judgment establishes that in criminal cases, particularly those relying on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and any reasonable....
The court emphasized that circumstantial evidence must form a complete and unbroken chain to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles for the appreciation of circumstantial evidence and the need for a complete chain of evidence to establish guilt beyo....
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.