SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 909

BHARATI DANGRE
Mayur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Amol Hunge, Advocate, V.A.Thakre, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present Revision Application is preferred by the applicant being aggrieved by the concurrent finding rendered by the JMFC, Vardha in Regular Criminal Case No. 175/2012 and by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Vardha in Criminal Appeal No. 93/2016. By the impugned judgments, the applicant stand convicted for the offence punishable u/s.451 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for four months and to pay fine of Rs.1, 000.00, in default to suffer RI for one month. Apart, he is also convicted for the offence punishable u/s.354 of IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for six months and to pay fine of Rs.2, 000.00, in default, to suffer RI for two months. The sentence of Imprisonment being directed to run concurrently, the fine was directed to be paid to the prosecutrix.

2. Heard learned counsel Mr.Amol Hunge for the Applicant and learned APP Mr.Thakare for the State. The incident reported by PW 1 Jayshree Sanjay Chore which is alleged to have taken place on 15/3/2012 at around 1.30 p.m in her house, resulted in registration of C.R.No. 95/2012 which invoke Sec. 451 and 354 of the IPC. It was informed by PW 1, mother of the victim girl, aged 12-13 years, that while her daughter was all al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top