SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 995

G. A. SANAP
Harikesh – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Police Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.I.Ghatte, Advocate, S.A.Ashirgade, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally by consent of the learned advocates for the parties.

2. In this criminal writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner of Police, Amravati Zone-1 dtd. 5/4/2022, whereby he was ordered to be externed from the Amravati City as well as Amravati District and also the order dtd. 28/9/2022 passed by the Appellate Authority-Respondent No.3 confirming the order of externment passed by the respondent No.1 dtd. 5/4/2022.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the petition can be summarized as follows: The respondent No.1 initiated proceeding for externment of the petitioner from Amravati District by invoking the provisions of Sec. 56(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (for short "the Act of 1951"). The respondent No.1 to record his subjective satisfaction, relied upon the following crimes. The said crimes are set out hereinbelow in tabulated form:

4. The respondent No.1 conducted necessary inquiry. He issued a notice to the petitioner on 4/3/2022 to show cause as to why he should not be externed from the Amravati District. The respondent No.1, based on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top