SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 930

G. A. SANAP
Nitin – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.B.Kasat, Advocate, H.D.Dubey, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned Advocates for the parties.

3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order of externment passed by the respondent No.2- Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-1, Amravati dtd. 5/4/2022 and the order in appeal dtd. 29/9/2022 passed by the respondent No.1-Divisional Commissioner, Amravati District Amravati. The respondent No.2 initiated the proceedings for externment of the petitioner from Amravati District by invoking the provisions of Sec. 56(1)(a) & (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1951"). The respondent No.2 to record his subjective satisfaction, relied upon the following crimes. The said crimes are set out hereinbelow in tabulated form:

4. The respondent No.2 conducted necessary inquiry. He issued a notice to the petitioner on 24/3/2022 to show cause as to why he should not be externed from the Amravati District. The respondent No.2, based on the material collected, passed the order of externment on 5/4/2022. The petitioner challenged the said order by filing an appeal before the respondent No.1. The respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top