SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 676

G. A. SANAP
Bhushan S/o Chandu Pohokar – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S.B. Gandhe.
For the Respondent: M.H. Deshmukh.

JUDGMENT :

G.A. SANAP, J.

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned Advocates for the parties.

3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order of externment passed by the respondent No. 2- Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-1, Amravati dated 13.05.2022 and the order in appeal dated 04.11.2022 passed by the respondent No. 1-Divisional Commissioner, Amravati District Amravati. The respondent No. 2 initiated the proceedings for externment of the petitioner from Amravati District by invoking the provisions of Section 56(1) (a) & (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1951”). The respondent No. 2 to record his subjective satisfaction, relied upon the following crimes. The said crimes are set out herein-below in tabulated form:

S. No.

Police Station

Crime No.

Sections

Dated

Case Status

1.

Gadge Nagar

551/2016

341, 323 IPC

20/07/2016

Pending in Court

2.

Gadge Nagar

341/2017

354(A), 354(D) IPC R/w. S. 8, 12 of POCSO

27/

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top