SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 78

G. A. SANAP
Pratik S/o Prakashrao Kamble – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J.Y. Ghurde.
For the Respondent: H.D. Dubey.

JUDGMENT :

G.A. SANAP, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Advocates for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this petition has challenged the order of his externment dated 16.03.2022 passed by the respondent No. 2-Deputy Commissioner of Police Zone-2 Amaravati (City) as well as the order passed by the respondent No. 1-Divisional Commissioner, Amravati, dated 25.08.2022, confirming the order of the externment in appeal.

3. The respondent No. 2, by invoking the provisions of Section 56 Sub-Section (1), clauses (a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1951” for short), ordered externment of the petitioner and directed him to remove himself outside the limits of Amravati City and Amravati District for a period of two years. In the inquiry conducted before passing the order of externment, the respondent No. 2 relied upon four crimes and one chapter proceeding initiated under Section 110 (e) (g) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Rajapeth Police Station, Amravati. Out of four crimes, 2 registered a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top