IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KAMAL KHATA, J.
Miloni Shah Nee Ramesh Vora – Appellant
Versus
Orbit Developers – Respondent
Commercial Summary Suit No. 55 of 2022 With Interim Application No. 3415 of 2022
Decided on : 01-09-2023.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XXXVII, Rule 2 – Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 – Section 13(2) – Summary suit – Suit for recovery of an amount – Interest – Plaintiff is entitled to proceed with execution of the decree without waiting for the decree to be sealed. Para 12
Finding of Court : Writ of summons was served by plaintiff upon defendants and an affidavit of service to that effect has been filed by bailiff from office of the sheriff of Bombay – In spite of service upon defendants, they failed to enter an appearance in the matter – Court accordingly grant a decree against the defendants in sum along with interest thereon at rate of 18% per annum from date of filing of suit till payment and/or realization thereof – Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fees – Plaintiffs are also entitled to costs in addition to deficit of refund of court fees that was paid by plaintiff during filing of the suit.
Result : Disposed of
JUDGMENT :
1. The present suit is filed as a summary suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of an amount of Rs. 2,00,64,940/- along with interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till payment and/or realization thereof.
2. The plaintiff executed a letter of allotment dated 2nd April 2017 with Orbit Ventures & Co. defendant no 1 (a partnership firm) in respect of flat no.1202 Chakravarti Ashok Cooperative Housing Society Limited Andheri as particularly set out in Exhibit A of the Plaint. A Letter of allotment was issued by defendant to the plaintiff on 2nd April 2017 against payment of part consideration being Rs.1,59,88,500/ out of which 1,53,00,00 is towards the flat no.1202 and Rs.6,88,600 was towards service charges. The Agreement for Sale was executed in January 2018 which recorded that the total consideration amount was 2,68,59,650/- .
3. In view of the project being delayed, at the request of the Plaintiff, the allotment of flat No. 1202 was cancelled and a commercial unit of 600 sq ft was allotted to the plaintiff in project known as “Water Front” a project of the sister concern of the Defendant. The plaintiff and the defendant executed a Memorandum of understanding in November 2020 for allotment of a commercial unit ad-measuring 600 square feet in the project for a consideration of Rs. 1,32,00,000/-. It was agreed in the MOU that the balance will be adjusted against the taxes, other charges at the time of possession. The plaintiff has learned that the defendants have taken a loan from India. Infoline Finance Limited (IIFL) in respect of the Project and has executed an Indenture of Mortgage dated 31st March 2015.
4. The plaintiff learnt that the loan taken by the defendants was now classified as an NPA as per RBI guidelines and the outstanding as per the notice under section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is to the tune of Rs. 147,45,89,688/-.
5. In these circumstances, the plaintiff by his advocate’s letter dated 30th September 2021, placed the above facts on the record, terminated the MOU and called upon the defendants to refund the sum of Rs. 1,59,88,500/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from November 2020 till payment and/or realization thereof.
6. The plaintiffs have learnt that the defendant has not proceeded with the project since then and although defendant got approved the commencement certificate in April 2019 to construct upto 5th floor, defendant have constructed only up to the plinth since 31st March 2018.) Besides this, there is an outstanding of Rs. 147,45,89,688/- due and payable to IIFL. In these circumstances the plaintiff has filed a suit as a summary suit for recovery of outstanding dues. As per the particulars of claim, more particularly, stated at Exhibit J of the plaint, an amount of Rs.2,00,64,940 is due and payable by the defendants jointly and severally to the plaintiffs along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till payment and/or realization.
7. The writ of summons was served by the plaintiff upon the defendants on 30th July 2022 and an affidavit of service to that effect has been filed by the bailiff from the office of the sheriff of Bombay on 26th September 2022. In spite of service upon the defendants, they failed to enter an appearance in the matter.
8. Mr. Gada, the learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that in view of Order XXXVII Rule 2(3), the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment forthwith. By an order dated 10th July 2023 this court recorded that the plaintiff has filed the affidavit of evidence in lieu of examination-in-chief dated 10th July 2023 of Mr. Ramesh Nanalal Vora, who has administered oath in the court and also tendered the original documents on behalf of the plaintiff along with an affidavit dated 3rd January 2023.
9. In view of the provisions of Order XXXVII R
The judgment established the principles of liquidated damages and reasonable compensation under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and emphasized the importance of genuine triable issues in determining t....
In the event of allotment of flat, forfeiture of initial deposit on refund amount cannot be exorbitant.
Validating settlement negotiation to resolve refund disputes in contract law.
Delayed claims by commercial entities post-CIRP announcement and CoC approval not condonable; must reflect in records or protected encumbrances to be admissible as financial debt.
Forfeiture of earnest money beyond 10% of the sale price without evidence of actual loss is unreasonable; hence, only reasonable deductions from consumer funds are permissible.
(1) Breach of reciprocal contractual obligations – A commercial document ought not to be interpreted in a manner that arrives at a complete variance with what may originally have been intention of pa....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.