IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. CHANDURKAR, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4323 of 2023
Decided On : 12-01-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for writ of mandamus to enforce statutory duties. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks enforcement of recovery warrants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. legal basis of tax collection and authority. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. opposition to enforcement of recovery certificates. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. court's findings regarding interpretation of recovery authority. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 6. toll tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
| 7. judgment passed in favor of petitioner. (Para 73 , 74 , 75) |
JUDGMENT :
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
1. RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.
2. By the present Petition, the Petitioner is seeking the following final reliefs:
3. The Petitioner is a statutory body incorporated under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, (“the DMC Act”) having the responsibility of monitoring, upgrading and developing civic amenities which are entrusted to it under the statute as detailed in the DMC Act. One of the functions with which the Petitioner is entrusted is Toll Tax Collection from the commercial vehicles entering Delhi from 124 toll points around Delhi, which is also one of the main sources of its revenue under Section 113 (2)(g) of the DMC Act.
4. Since the Petitioner does not have the man power to collect the Toll Tax and to monitor the huge daily cash collection of almost Rs. 2.5 Crores per day from the said 124 toll points, the said work is given on contract basis to third parties under the Delhi Municipal (Toll Tax) Byelaws, 2007 (“the 2007 Bye-laws”) read with Section 113 of the DMC Act.
5. Respondent No. 7 is one of the parties to which such a Contract was given. It is the case of the Petitioner that Respondent No. 7 started making defaults and made delayed remittances to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (“SDMC”) from the beginning itself, for which penalties were imposed upon it from time to time. That when huge defaults accumulated over a period of time, the Petitioner was compelled to issue various demand notices.
6. Respondent No. 7 defaulted in payment of the due amount and the same is liable to be recovered under the DMC Act. In furtherance thereof, the Petitioner sought to recover a sum of Rs. 3927,06,55,004/- towards dues under the DMC Act, which has (as on 30th April, 2022) become Rs. 4970,81,91,077/- by calculation of interest/penalty under the Contract Provisions.
7. It is also the case of the Petitioner that is duty bound and under a statutory obligation to recover the said amounts due from Respondent No. 7 on account of Toll Tax collection, which Respondent No. 7 has failed and defaulted to deposit with the Government Exchequer. In exercise of such functions, the Petitioner has issued warrants of distress for attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties of Respondent No. 7 for recovering the said dues as arrears of tax.
8. Since some of the properties of Respondent No. 7 are situated outside the territory of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, including in Mumbai, Thane and Pune Districts of Maharashtra, which are within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, the Petitioner sought the assistance of Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to act on its request to attach properties of Respondent No. 7 in i
Babu Verghese and Others vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Others
Devilal Modi vs. Sates Tax Officer, Ratlam
Dr. H.S. Rikhy and Others vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
M.I. Builders vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu and Others
Molar Mal vs. Kay Iron Works (P) Ltd. (2000) 4 SCC 285
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Nawab Hussain
Sahni Silk Mills Ltd. vs. Employees’ State Insurance Corporation
AI
The court affirmed that toll taxes collected by the Municipal Corporation are capable of being recovered as arrears of land revenue under the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890, enabling the issuance of warr....
A municipal corporation can recover dues such as toll tax as arrears of land revenue through provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act.
Recovery Officers cannot adjudicate unadjudicated claims during execution proceedings under the RDDB Act.
Article 137 of Limitation Act reads as description of application.
The recovery of rent due to the Nagar Palika from a tenant in respect of immovable property other than land vested or entrusted to the management of the Nagar Palika can be made under Section 292 of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.