SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. CHANDURKAR, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4323 of 2023
Decided On : 12-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Gaurav Joshi, Sanjay Vashishtha, Shreyas Shrivastava, Tanisha Choudhary, Shilpa Joshi, Sumit Kumar.
For the Respondents: Birendra Saraf, P.P. Kakade, A.I. Patel, S.B. Kalel, Pradeep Sancheti, Darshit Jain, Deepak Deshmukh, Deepak Chitnis, Vivek Dwivedi.

The court affirmed that toll taxes collected by the Municipal Corporation are capable of being recovered as arrears of land revenue under the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890, enabling the issuance of warrants for collection.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 113; Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Section 5 - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioner sought issuance of warrants of distress against a defaulter in tax payments; Respondent No. 7 failed to remit amounts due under the contracts with the Petitioner - The Court emphasized the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation as the chief officer responsible for revenue collection in municipal areas - The issue of whether the Recovery Certificates were issued by a qualified Collector as per the Revenue Recovery Act was critical, leading to a finding that these do qualify - The Court concluded that toll tax assessed under DMC Act can be treated as recoverable under the Revenue Recovery Act - Writ Petition allowed directing Respondents to take action as per warrants issued (Paras 74-76).

(B) Statutory duties of municipal authorities - The interpretation of statutory provisions must avoid absurdity and recognize the practical aspects of urban revenue collection. (Paras 60-72).

Table of Content
1. petition for writ of mandamus to enforce statutory duties. (Para 1)
2. petitioner seeks enforcement of recovery warrants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. legal basis of tax collection and authority. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
4. opposition to enforcement of recovery certificates. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
5. court's findings regarding interpretation of recovery authority. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
6. toll tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
7. judgment passed in favor of petitioner. (Para 73 , 74 , 75)

JUDGMENT :

FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.

1. RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. By the present Petition, the Petitioner is seeking the following final reliefs:

    “(a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to take steps as per law and discharge their statutory duty by executing the warrants of distress/recovery certificates dated 26.11.2021, 20.12.2021, 22.12.2021, 21.02.2023, 27.02.2023 and 02.03.2023 issued by the Petitioner and more specifically mentioned in Para 20 hereinabove.”

3. The Petitioner is a statutory body incorporated under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, (“the DMC Act”) having the responsibility of monitoring, upgrading and developing civic amenities which are entrusted to it under the statute as detailed in the DMC Act. One of the functions with which the Petitioner is entrusted is Toll Tax Collection from the commercial vehicles entering Delhi from 124 toll points around Delhi, which is also one of the main sources of its revenue under Section 113 (2)(g) of the DMC Act.

4. Since the Petitioner does not have the man power to collect the Toll Tax and to monitor the huge daily cash collection of almost Rs. 2.5 Crores per day from the said 124 toll points, the said work is given on contract basis to third parties under the Delhi Municipal (Toll Tax) Byelaws, 2007 (“the 2007 Bye-laws”) read with Section 113 of the DMC Act.

5. Respondent No. 7 is one of the parties to which such a Contract was given. It is the case of the Petitioner that Respondent No. 7 started making defaults and made delayed remittances to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (“SDMC”) from the beginning itself, for which penalties were imposed upon it from time to time. That when huge defaults accumulated over a period of time, the Petitioner was compelled to issue various demand notices.

6. Respondent No. 7 defaulted in payment of the due amount and the same is liable to be recovered under the DMC Act. In furtherance thereof, the Petitioner sought to recover a sum of Rs. 3927,06,55,004/- towards dues under the DMC Act, which has (as on 30th April, 2022) become Rs. 4970,81,91,077/- by calculation of interest/penalty under the Contract Provisions.

7. It is also the case of the Petitioner that is duty bound and under a statutory obligation to recover the said amounts due from Respondent No. 7 on account of Toll Tax collection, which Respondent No. 7 has failed and defaulted to deposit with the Government Exchequer. In exercise of such functions, the Petitioner has issued warrants of distress for attachment and sale of movable and immovable properties of Respondent No. 7 for recovering the said dues as arrears of tax.

8. Since some of the properties of Respondent No. 7 are situated outside the territory of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, including in Mumbai, Thane and Pune Districts of Maharashtra, which are within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, the Petitioner sought the assistance of Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to act on its request to attach properties of Respondent No. 7 in i

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top