IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S. Waghwase, JJ.
Vijay s/o. Sahebrao Patil - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.295 Of 2017
Decided On : 06-11-2023
Dying Declarations - Conviction under Section 302 of IPC - [Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay; AIR 1958 SC 22, Paniben v. State of Gujarat; (1992) 2 SCC 774, Laxman v. State of Maharashtra; (2002) 6 SCC 710, Ganpat Bakaramji Lad v. State of Maharashtra; 2011 ALL MR Cri. 2249, Surendrakumar v. State of Punjab; (2012) 12 SCC 120, Jagbir Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi); (2019) 8 SCC 779, Madan v. State of Maharashtra; (2019) 13 SCC 464, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Veerapal and another; (2022) 4 SCC 741, Uttam v. State of Maharashtra; (2022) 8 SCC 576, Abhishek Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) [Criminal Appeal No.1473 of 2011, decided on 18-10-2023], Mangoo and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh; AIR 1995 SC 959, Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra; 1997 (5) SCC 341, Ratansinh Dalsukhabhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat; (2004) 1 SCC 64, Gagan Kanojia and another v. State of Punjab; (2006) 13 SCC 516, Nivrutti Pandurang Kokate and ors. v. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2008 SC 1460, Hari Om v. State of U.P.; (2021) 4 SCC 345] - The court discussed the evidentiary value of dying declarations and the principles governing their acceptance. The court emphasized the need for voluntary and reliable dying declarations and the scrutiny of the mental condition of the declarant. The court also highlighted the principles related to child witnesses and the need for careful scrutiny of their evidence.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC based on dying declarations and the testimony of a child witness. The deceased had made consistent dying declarations accusing the appellant of setting her on fire. The child witness corroborated the dying declarations. The court analyzed the evidentiary value of the dying declarations and the testimony of the child witness, ultimately finding the case of the prosecution to be proved.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the dying declarations to be consistent and reliable, and the testimony of the child witness to be credible. The court concluded that the case of the prosecution was proved and upheld the conviction under Section 302 of the IPC.
Issues: The issues involved the evidentiary value of dying declarations and the testimony of a child witness in a case of conviction under Section 302 of the IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for voluntary and reliable dying declarations and the scrutiny of the mental condition of the declarant. The court also highlighted the principles related to child witnesses and the need for careful scrutiny of their evidence.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and directed the District Legal Services Authority to undertake an enquiry for the rehabilitation of the deceased's children.
JUDGMENT :
Abhay S. Waghwase, J.
1. Conviction and sentence recorded by Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, Dist.Jalgaon dated 11-05-2017 in Sessions Case No.5 of 2016 for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) has resulted into filing of instant appeal by invoking Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure thereby questioning the legality and sustainability of the impugned judgment.
CASE OF PROSECUTION IN BRIEF
2. Present appellant was chargesheeted by Amalner Police Station for commission of offence under Section 302, 504 of the IPC in the backdrop of FIR bearing 148 of 2015 registered on the strength of dying declaration Exh.25 recorded by a Lady Police Constable posted at Dhule City Police Station wherein deceased informed that her husband was addicted to liquor. Since 7-8 days prior to the occurrence, he was demanding money from her and on failure to meet the demand he abused her. Deceased gave statement that on 07-10-2015 at around 03:00 p.m. he again put up a demand of money for liquor, abused her and on refusal, sat on her, poured kerosene and thereafter ignited her. Brother and parents shifted her to the hospital where after on examination by PW4 Dr.Kuwar regarding fitness to give statement, her statement was recorded and initially offence was recorded under Section 307 and 504 of the IPC. She succumbed to 96% burns and so crime was converted to Section 302 of the IPC and accused was chargesheeted and finally tried by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, who passed above mentioned impugned order questioned before us in appeal.
SUBMISSIONS
On behalf of Appellant :
3. For relief of setting aside impugned judgment, learned Counsel for the appellant would submit that there are two dying declarations Exh.24 and Exh.25. He pointed out that deceased allegedly suffered 96% burns and therefore, it is doubtful whether she was in capacity to give statement. His second attack on same count is that in view of scoring and interpolations in the dying declarations, there is possibility of Doctor giving endorsement and certification by not examining the deceased but issuing certification by sitting in chamber. He further submitted that except child witness testimony, there is no other independent witness. When the child was with maternal uncle and being in custody of grand parents, possibility of child to be tutored cannot be ruled out and therefore, his evidence cannot be straightway accepted in absence of corroboration. He pointed out that in dying declarations it is stated that brother and parents of deceased have allegedly shifted her to the hospital, but none of them are examined. That history reported at the time of admission is also doubtful. All such crucial aspects have not been considered by the learned trial Judge and straightway dying declarations are relied and hence he prays to allow the appeal.
On behalf of State :
4. Per contra learned APP would submit that scribes of dying declarations have been examined by prosecution. That dying declarations are promptly recorded. That they are both consistent regarding role and overt act of appellant husband. That very child of deceased and appellant has deposed against his own father. Inspite of cross-examination, his evidence has remained unshaken and as such it is submitted that there is no reason to interfere in the judgment which is based on sound reasons and findings.
5. Here case of prosecution is rested on oral evidence of in all ten witnesses.
EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION
PW1 Dilip Sahebrao Patil is Pancha to spot panchanama. His evidence is at Exh.14. Spot panchanama is at Exh.15.
PW2 Dipak Vijay Patil is son of deceased and accused. He is a child witness. His evidence is at Exh.18-A.
PW3 Dr.Prakash Kisan Tale is the Doctor, who examined accused. His evidence is at Exh.21.
PW4 Dr.Ajayraj Anandraj Kuwar is the Doctor, who made endorsement on the dying
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay; AIR 1958 SC 22
Laxman v. State of Maharashtra; (2002) 6 SCC 710
Surendrakumar v. State of Punjab; (2012) 12 SCC 120
Jagbir Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi); (2019) 8 SCC 779
Madan v. State of Maharashtra; (2019) 13 SCC 464
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Veerapal and another; (2022) 4 SCC 741
Uttam v. State of Maharashtra; (2022) 8 SCC 576
Mangoo and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh; AIR 1995 SC 959
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra; 1997 (5) SCC 341
Ratansinh Dalsukhabhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat; (2004) 1 SCC 64
Nivrutti Pandurang Kokate and ors. v. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2008 SC 1460
Hari Om v. State of U.P.; (2021) 4 SCC 345
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra; (2013) 6 SCC 770
Victimology since the case of Maru Ram v. Union of India; (1981) 1 SCC 107
Hari Singh v. Sukhbir Singh; (1988) 4 SCC 551
Balraj v. State of U.P.; (1994) 4 SCC 29
Baldev Singh v. State of Punjab; (1995) 6 SCC 593
Jagjeet Singh and Others v. Ashish Mishra Alias Monu and Another; (2022) 9 SCC 321
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of voluntary and reliable dying declarations, the scrutiny of the mental condition of the declarant, and the careful evaluation of t....
The voluntary and truthful nature of dying declaration and the competency of a child witness to depose are crucial in establishing guilt and determining the appropriate criminal offense.
Dying declarations may serve as the sole basis for conviction if deemed voluntary, consistent, and credible; inconsistencies must be assessed in light of surrounding facts.
Dying declarations can be the sole basis for conviction if found to be voluntary and credible, regardless of minor inconsistencies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the admissibility and reliability of dying declarations, emphasizing the need for voluntariness, truthfulness, and corroboration, and the importanc....
Dying declarations can serve as the sole basis for conviction if they are consistent and credible; however, inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence can lead to reasonable doubt and acquitt....
The court reiterated the principles governing the admissibility and evidentiary value of dying declarations, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny to ensure their genuineness and reliability.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for caution in relying on dying declarations, the importance of corroborative evidence, and the entitlement of the accused to the benef....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.