SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sandeep V. Marne, J.
Crystal Construction Company & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.2540 of 2023
Decided On : 04-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Shadab Jan, Mr. Levi Rubens, Mr. Yohaan Rubens, Ms. Christine Rewrie, Ms. Tinaz Kapadia & Ms. Unnati Bane i/b. L. R. & Associates
For the Respondent: Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, AGP a/w. Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP

The Collector of Stamps must adhere to previous valuations and cannot apply new ASR for determining market value in cases remanded for fresh adjudication.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 31(3), 32(A)(4), and 36(1)(a) - Maharashtra Stamp (Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules, 1995 - Dispute regarding stamp duty on Deed of Conveyance - Collector of Stamps fixed market value at Rs. 41,69,02,000/- and demanded stamp duty of Rs. 1,97,95,100/- - Earlier valuation was Rs. 30,55,88,000/- with stamp duty of Rs. 1,52,77,900/- - Court held that the Charity Commissioner’s auction process must be followed, and the Collector erred in applying ASR 2021 instead of the earlier ASR - The market value is retained at Rs. 30,55,88,000/- and stamp duty modified to Rs. 1,42,27,900/-. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 41)

(B) Jurisdiction of Collector of Stamps - The Collector is entitled to examine the manner of sale conducted by the Charity Commissioner and determine the market value for stamp duty purposes. (Paras 18, 40)

(C) Scope of Remand - The remand order did not permit the Collector to apply a subsequent ASR for determining market value. (Paras 41, 42)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the Collector's order fixing the market value of a property sold by the Charity Commissioner, which was previously valued lower. The petitioner argued that the Collector overstepped the remand order by increasing the market value based on a new ASR.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Collector had erred in applying the new ASR and should have retained the previous valuation.

Issues: The main issues were whether the Collector could reassess the market value based on a new ASR and the legality of the auction process conducted by the Charity Commissioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Collector must adhere to the previous valuation and that the auction process must be transparent and public.

Result: The petition was allowed in part, with the market value fixed at Rs. 30,55,88,000/- and the stamp duty modified to Rs. 1,42,27,900/-.

JUDGMENT:

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

2. Petitioner has filed this petition taking an exception to the Order dated 16 September 2021 passed by Collector of Stamps, Andheri adjudicating the stamp duty leviable on Deed of Conveyance executed in Petitioner’s favour at Rs. 1,97,95,100/- by fixing the market value of the property at Rs. 41,69,02,000/-. Earlier, the Collector had passed order dated 16 March 2017 fixing the market value of the land at Rs. 30,55,88,000/- and had demanded stamp duty of Rs. 1,52,77,900/-. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.714 of 2018 challenging order dated 16 March 2017. The issue before this Court in that Petition was about applicability of Proviso to sub-Rule 6 of Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Stamp (Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules 1995 (Maharashtra Stamp Rules, 1995) under which, pre-determined value in a sale conducted by the Government or Semi Government body or Government Undertakings or a Local Authority is required to be treated as true market value of the property for levy of stamp duty. This Court held that sale conducted by the Charity Commissioner is covered under the first Proviso of Rule 4(6). This Court accordingly remanded the proceedings before the Collector of Stamps for adjudication of stamp duty payable by taking into consideration the first Proviso to Rule 4(6) and Circular dated 13 October 2006. In remanded proceedings, Respondent No.2 conducted inquiry into the manner of sale held by the Charity Commissioner and the price at which it is sold vis-à-vis the market value as per the Annual Statement of Rates (ASR) and has held that the market value as per ASR will have to be considered for levy of stamp duty. Respondent No. 2 has however applied ASR for the year 2021 and increased the market value to Rs. 41,69,02,000/- which was earlier fixed at Rs.30,55,88,000/- in previous order and has called upon Petitioner to pay Rs. 1,97,95,100/- as stamp duty.

3. A brief factual narration as a prologue to the Judgment would be necessary. Property bearing Survey No.8, Hissa No.1 (part) corresponding CTS No.201 admeasuring 3531.30 sq. mtrs. at village Marol, Mumbai (the land) was owned by A. H. Wadia Trust, which is public trust registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (the Trust Act). The trust land was apparently affected by large scale encroachments. Due to its inability to clear the encroachments, the Trust decided to alienate the land and published a Notice in newspapers for sale thereof. The Trust obtained valuation report in respect of the Trust property from M/s. C. D. Vaidya & Co., a Government Architect and Valuer, who valued the Trust property at Rs.1.28 Crores. Petitioner submitted an offer for purchase of the land, which was lower than valuation given by the highest bidder. The Trust decided to accept the valuation of highest bidder of Rs.1.60 Crores and filed an application under Section 36(1)(a) of the Trust Act before the Charity Commissioner seeking his approval. Some individuals intervened in the proceedings before Charity Commissioner, who directed to conduct fresh auction to get the best value in respect of the land. In the fresh auction so conducted, Petitioner offered to purchase the land at Rs. 2.10 Crores and by Order dated 26 April 2016, the Charity Commissioner accorded sanction for sale of the land to Petitioner on ‘as is where is basis’ and ‘as it is where it is basis’ for consideration of Rs. 2.10 Crores.

4. Petitioner submitted unexecuted Conveyance for adjudication to the Collector of Stamps, Andheri, who called for a report from Deputy Director of Town Planning regarding value of the land, who assessed the same at Rs. 30,55,58,000/-. The Collector of Stamps passed Order dated 16 March 2017 determining market value of the Trust property at Rs.30,55,88,000/-and adjudicated the stamp duty payab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top