R. G. AVACHAT
Mahima Pravin Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of the parties.
2. The challenge in this writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is to a judgment and order dtd. 19/1/2023, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Criminal Revision Application No.688 of 2022. Vide the judgment and order impugned herein, the order passed by Metropolitan Magistrate on 19/7/2022 has been set aside with a direction to Senior Inspector of Tromby Police Station, Mumbai to register FIR and make investigation on the basis of a report made by the Applicant, Prakash Lalwani on 23/2/2021. Thus, what has been challenged herein is an order passed under Sec. 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. Facts giving rise to this writ petition are as follows: Petitioner No.1 is the daughter of Petitioner No.2. They are residents of Green Acres Bungalows, Din Quarry Road, Panjarpole, Deonar, Mumbai, a housing society. The respondent No.2 is also the resident of the same housing society. Master Manav (deceased) was 24 years old son of the respondent No.2. Both, Manav and Petitioner No.1-Mahima, had a romantic relationship inter se for little over two years. There
B.S. Khatri vs. State of Maharashtra
Gurcharan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Hdfc Securities Limited and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
Jagannath Verma and Ors. vs. State of U.P
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh
Narayandas S/O. Hiralalji Sarda and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
The court established that mere allegations of a quarrel do not suffice to prove abetment of suicide under Sec. 306 IPC without clear evidence of intent (mens rea) to instigate the act.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or proximity, along with mens rea.
The power to investigate is exclusively reserved for the police officers, and the High Court cannot change the investigating officer in the midstream and appoint any agency of its own choice to inves....
The need for a responsible invocation of the power u/s 156 (3) Cr.P.C. and the mandatory nature of Section 154(1) of the Code for registration of FIRs.
The magistrate's discretion under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. must be exercised judiciously, and the registration of an FIR is mandatory only when a cognizable offence is disclosed; otherwise, the applica....
Revision maintainable against dismissal of Section 156(3) CrPC application; prior police complaints evidenced by postal receipts satisfy precondition; forgery to obtain scheme benefits discloses cogn....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.