Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SHAMRAO SARJERAO ADSUL – Appellant
Versus
VISHAL JALINDHAR AADSUL AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
1] The applications for assist to public prosecutor are allowed.
2] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
3] The applicants in respective applications are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0420 of 2024, dated 02.11.2024, registered at Paithan Police Station, District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 333, 115(2), 118(1), 189(2), 189, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 & Crime No.0423 of 2024, dated 02.11.2024, registered at Paithan Police Station, District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 respectively.
4] The cross-FIRs are filed in Crime No.0420 of 2024 – 9 accused, whereas in Crime No.0423 of 2024 – 10 accused and the parties are neighbours, so also, relatives. This court by interim orders has protected the respective applicants. Considering the fight between 2 groups who are neighbours who are also relatives resulting in cross-FIRs and the injuries are sustained by both the groups and most of the in
Interim protection in anticipatory bail applications can be confirmed with conditions to maintain peace and cooperate with investigations, especially in cases involving family disputes.
The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. based on the nature of injuries and the applicant's cooperation in the investigation, emphasizing that merits of the case are not to be c....
The court confirmed interim protection for applicants in an anticipatory bail application, emphasizing cooperation with the investigation and setting conditions for bail.
The court's decision to grant anticipatory bail was based on the applicants' cooperation with the investigation.
An anticipatory bail application cannot be denied solely based on the applicant's criminal antecedents, and cooperation with ongoing investigations can justify granting bail.
The Court granted pre-arrest bail where the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents and the First Information Statement contained no specific allegations linking the individual to the principal o....
Bail granted where insufficient evidence exists for continued detention of accused.
The court considered the nature of the dispute and the applicants' cooperation in the investigation to grant interim protection and bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
