The court emphasized procedural compliance in issuing notice to respondents in a legal matter.

Headnote:(A) No specific laws or sections cited in the judgment.

(B) The court addressed procedural aspects regarding notice issuance to respondents.

(C) The petitioners were represented by an advocate, and the state waived service of notice.

(D) The main issue was the issuance of notice to the respondents. (E) The court's reasoning focused on procedural compliance and scheduling. (F) The final decision was to issue notice returnable on 30th January, 2025. (G) Parties involved: Petitioners and Respondent No. 1/State.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners.

2. Perused the papers on record.

3. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 30th January, 2025 . Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1/State.