SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Tri) 29

ARINDAM LODH
Rajib Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. Bhaumik, Advocate, D. Sarma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. A. Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

2. Also heard Mr. D. Sarma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the State-respondents.

3. Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a Rule should not be issued as prayed for; and why such further or other orders shall not be passed as to this court may deem fit and proper.

4. Notice is made returnable within 3(three) weeks.

5. Since Mr. D. Sarma, learned Add.G.A. appears and accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents, no formal notice needs be issued to those respondents.

6. List the matter on 13.02.2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top