SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Tri) 36

ARINDAM LODH
Pradip Chanda – Appellant
Versus
Jadu Lal Roy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, D Paul, Advocate, P. Roy Barman, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, D. Debnath, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the delay of 3 days in preferring the instant appeal shall not be condoned, as prayed for; and/or why such further and other order(s) shall not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper.

3. Notice is made returnable on 21.02.2023.

4. The applicant shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents within 7(seven) days by registered post with AD.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top