SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 239

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Pranati Roy (Das). – Appellant
Versus
Biva Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P Dhar, Advocate, H Debbarma, Advocate, John Debbarma, Advocate, H Debbarma, Advocate, Pradip Chakraborty, Advocate, S Debnath, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - None appears for the appellant.

2. Mr.P.Chakraborty, learned counsel has appeared for respondent No.1,2,5 and 6.

3. It appears from the report dated 05.12.2022 furnished by the Registry that notice issued on Respondent No. 8, 10 and 12 has been returned un-served and in respect of respondent No. 4,3,7,9,11 and 13, it is reported that no postal report has yet been received in respect of service of notice on these respondents.

4. Petitioner is to take required steps for service of notice on the said respondents.

5. List the matter on 12.01.2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top