Back
Next 
2023 Supreme(Tri) 27
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Chandan Debbarma & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Malin Debbarma & Ors. - Respondents
Regular Second Appeal 34 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2023
Important Points
Timely service of notice is essential in civil proceedings, with the court granting a 7 days extension to the appellants for compliance.
Subject
Civil Law - Notice and Service
Headnote
(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Rules on service of notice - The court allows the appellants 7 days to take steps for service of notice on the respondent no. 12, highlighting the procedural requirement for communication in civil appeals. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
The appellants, represented by counsel, sought an extension to serve notice on the respondents as part of their regular second appeal proceedings.
Findings of Court:
The court granted a time extension of 7 days to the appellants for serving notice.
Issues: The primary issue was the timely service of notice to the respondent no. 12 by the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the importance of following proper procedures for notice in civil proceedings, reiterating that timely communication is critical for the proper conduct of appeals.
Result: Time extension granted.
Facts of the case:
The appellants, represented by counsel, sought an extension to serve notice on the respondents as part of their regular second appeal proceedings.
Findings of Court:
The court granted a time extension of 7 days to the appellants for serving notice.
Issues: The primary issue was the timely service of notice to the respondent no. 12 by the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the importance of following proper procedures for notice in civil proceedings, reiterating that timely communication is critical for the proper conduct of appeals.
Result: Time extension granted.
Advocates appeared:
Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, P Roy Barman, Advocate, A Debbarma, Advocate, N Ghosh, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, T Chakraborty, Advocate, Dj Saha, Advocate
Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, P Roy Barman, Advocate, A Debbarma, Advocate, N Ghosh, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, T Chakraborty, Advocate, Dj Saha, Advocate
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for service of notice on respondents (Para 1) |
| 2. time allowance for procedural steps (Para 2) |
| 3. next hearing date set (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Ms. S. Debbarman, learned counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that steps are to be taken by the appellants for service of notice upon the respondent no. 12.
2. Accordingly, 7 days time is allowed to the appellants to take steps.
3. List the matter on 24.03.2023.
