Back
ARINDAM LODH
Chandan Debbarma – Appellant
Versus
Malin Debbarma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for service of notice on respondents (Para 1) |
| 2. time allowance for procedural steps (Para 2) |
| 3. next hearing date set (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Ms. S. Debbarman, learned counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that steps are to be taken by the appellants for service of notice upon the respondent no. 12.
2. Accordingly, 7 days time is allowed to the appellants to take steps.
3. List the matter on 24.03.2023.
Timely service of notice is essential in civil proceedings, with the court granting a 7 days extension to the appellants for compliance.
The court may condone a short delay in filing an appeal if justified, emphasizing the necessity for expedient legal processes.
Court recognizes the necessity for fair hearing by issuing notice to respondents in a writ petition.
The court emphasized timely adjudication of applications in civil proceedings.
The court emphasized procedural compliance in issuing notice to respondents in a legal matter.
The court emphasized the necessity of proper notice to respondents before further proceedings.
The court emphasizes the necessity of proper service of notice to all respondents to ensure effective judicial proceedings.
A representative's acceptance of notice nullifies the need for formal notice issuance in a writ petition.
Judicial efficiency necessitates expedited processing of appeals in civil matters to ensure timely justice.
Timely filing of affidavit in reply is crucial in the court proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
