IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ALOK ARADHE, SANDEEP V.MARNE
UTO Nederland B.V. – Appellant
Versus
Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep V. Marne, J.
A. THE CHALLENGE
1) Commercial Appeal No.66/2012 is filed by the Plaintiffs challenging the judgment and order dated 22 December 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing Notice of Motion No. 993/2009 filed by the Plaintiffs seeking temporary injunction against the Defendant from passing off by use of the marks ‘MANSION HOUSE’, ‘M.H.’, ‘M.H.B.’ and ‘Savoy Club’ and committing infringement of Plaintiff’s copyrights in labels associated with the said marks. The Defendant has filed Counterclaim in Plaintiff’s suit and in that Counterclaim, the Defendant filed Notice of Motion No. 1287/2010 seeking injunction against the Plaintiffs from manufacturing and/or bottling and/or marking and/or trading and/or otherwise dealing in the alcoholic products and like goods bearing the trademarks ‘MANSION HOUSE’ and ‘SAVOY CLUB’ and other trademark deceptively similar to Defendant’s trademark ‘MANSION HOUSE’ and ‘SAVOY CLUB’ so as to commit the tort of passing off. Notice of Motion No. 1287/2010 filed by the Defendants in its Counterclaim has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge by judgment and order dated 7 February 2025, which is subject ma
Nagindas Ramdas Versus. Dalpatram Ichharam alias Brijram and others
Indu Kakkar Versus. Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and another
Grasim Industries Limited and another Versus. Agarwal Steel
M/s. Power Control Appliances and others Versus. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd.
Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd. and another Versus. Sudhir Bhatia and others
Wander Ltd. and another Versus. Antox India P. Ltd.
N.R. Dongre and others Versus. Whirlpool Corporation and another
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Versus. Prius Auto Industries Limited and others
Noorul Hassan Versus. Nahakpam Indrajit Singh and others
Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. Versus. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and others
State of Uttar Pradesh and others Versus. Hirendra Pal Singh and others
S.J.S. Business Enterprises (P) Ltd. Versus. State of Bihar and others
Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta Versus. Patel Narandas Haribhai
K.R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar Versus. Sri Ambal & Co.and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.