Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.JAMADAR
Damodar Purshottam Thakkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case circumstances leading to the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the counsel for both parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. emphasis on negligence and passenger status in the debate. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legislative interpretation of 'untoward incident' in case law. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. guiding principles on liability and intoxication regarding claims. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. discussion on ticket possession and bona fide status. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. final determination supporting the appeal and compensation. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT:
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
1. This Appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 (“the Act of 1987”) is directed against the judgment and award dated 21st April 2016, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai, whereby the Claim Application No. OA (IIU)/ MCC/840/2010, preferred by the Appellants-Applicants under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (“the Railways Act”) for compensation on account of death of their son, Kaushik (“the deceased”) in an untoward incident on 7th July 2010, came to be dismissed.
2. The background facts leading to this Appeal can be stated
The principle of no fault liability applies under the Railways Act, meaning contributory negligence cannot negate entitlement to compensation for untoward incidents.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for deaths from untoward incidents unless exceptions under Section 124A apply; negligence is irrelevant to claim validity.
Compensation under Railways Act requires proof of bona fide passenger status; strict liability does not extend where exceptions apply and evidence counters passenger validity.
Liability under Section 124A of the Railways Act is strict and no evidence of negligence is required once an untoward incident is established involving a bona fide passenger.
Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 imposes strict liability on Railways for deaths from untoward incidents, with no requirement for proving negligence or production of a ticket to establish bona ....
The deceased was established as a bona fide passenger, making the Railway Administration strictly liable for compensation under Section 124A due to the untoward incident leading to his death.
Negligence of a deceased passenger does not affect the strict liability for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, as accidental falls while boarding a train are deemed untoward inciden....
The court ruled that an accidental falling of a bona fide passenger from a train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under the Railways Act, mandating strict liability for compensation, irrespective o....
Strict liability under Section 124A of the Railways Act mandates compensation for untoward incidents involving bona fide passengers, regardless of negligence claims or absence of tickets.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for the death of a bona fide passenger resulting from an untoward incident, irrespective of negligence, provided the incident falls within ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
