SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1376

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR
Uday Dalal – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mumbai Division – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Shlok Parekh, Mr. Nishit Dhruva, Mr. Yash Dhruva, Ms. Niyati Merchant, Mr. Harsh Sheth, Ms. Drishtii Dhruva and Ms. Rajlaxmi Pawar i/by MDP Legal for the petitioners, Mr. Aashish Kamat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shlok Parekh
For the Respondent:Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP, Mr. M.M. Vashi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Itisha Ranka, Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranav Nair and Praharshi Saxena i/by M/s. Purnanand & Co., Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar, AGP, Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr. N. Bhadrashete, Mr. Krishkumar A. Jain, and Mr. Kalpesh A. Bandre i/by Mr. Ritesh K. Jain

Table of Content
1. background of cooperative membership dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. arguments regarding procedural violations in membership application (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. judicial review standards for cooperative societies' decisions (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
4. locus standi of members in challenging membership decisions (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
5. legality of agm resolutions regarding membership (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
6. final orders and directions on membership verification (Para 56)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. Both writ petitions arise from proceedings under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Deputy Registrar granted membership to respondent No.3 in relation to a room of 250 square feet situated on the North East side of the building of respondent No.4 society. The petitioners challenge this decision.

2. The petitioners place the following facts on record. Respondent No.4 was registered as a housing society on 2 May 1996. Six of the seven original occupants paid the requ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top