IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MILIND N.JADHAV
Anil D.Ambani – Appellant
Versus
Indian Overseas Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved and nature of applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's claims regarding qualifications of auditors. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. background of fraud classification and audits. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. criteria for assessing the validity of the far. (Para 49 , 50 , 71) |
| 5. decision granting interim relief to the plaintiff. (Para 80 , 81 , 84) |
JUDGMENT :
MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
1. Heard Mr. Joshi and Mr. Kamat, learned Senior Advocates and Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Advocate for Plaintiff / Applicant, Mr. Andhyarujina, Mr. Setalvad and Mr. Bharucha, learned Senior Advocates for Defendant No.1 - Bank and Mr. Dwarkadas, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos.2 and 3 in all three (3) suits.
2. In Indian Overseas Bank Suit (L) No. 35923 of 2025, Interim Application (L) No. 35925 of 2025 is filed by Plaintiff seeking interim reliefs under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) and Interim Application (L) No.35924 of 2025 is filed seeking order under Order II Rule 2 of CPC. In IDBI Bank Ltd. Suit (L) No. 37573 of 2025, Interim Application (L) No. 37575 of 2025 is filed by Plaintiff seeking interim reliefs under Order XXXIX Rule
OPTO Circuit India Limited Vs. Axis Bank and Ors.
Arun Kumar and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Kholapur Canesugar Works Ltd and Another Vs. Union of India
Tara Singh and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi Vs. Vatika Township Private Limited
State of Orissa v. Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd.
Patil Automation (P) Ltd v. Rakheja Engineers (P) Ltd.
Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited Vs. Union of India
Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle
V.B. Prasad Vs. Manager, P.M.D.U.P. School and Ors.
Chandravathi P.K. and Ors. Vs. C.K. Saji
State of Punjab and Others Vs. Arun Kumar Aggarwal and Others
The court determined that a Forensic Audit Report must be authored by a qualified Chartered Accountant, as required by statutory provisions, to constitute valid basis for fraud classification by bank....
RBI Fraud Master Directions-2024 apply prospectively, validating prior 2016 audits by non-CA forensic experts; Single Judge erred granting interim stay beyond pleadings without prima facie case, bala....
The classification of an account as fraud involves the right to representation but does not mandate a personal hearing under the Master Directions on Fraud. This aligns with the principles of natural....
(1) Loan frauds – Consistent with the principles of natural justice, lender banks should provide opportunity to a borrower by furnishing a copy of audit reports and allow borrower a reasonable opport....
The formation of an opinion under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 must be demonstrably based on established circumstances, failing which the investigation order is invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.