IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited - Applicant
Versus
Hiroo Hotchand Advani And Another - Respondents
Chamber Summons No.550 Of 2019, Commercial Execution Application No.43 Of 2025, Chamber Summons No.552 Of 2019 In Commercial Execution Application No.44 Of 2025
Decided On : 23-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitral awards for loan recovery with interest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. demand draft tendered for full settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court directs decision on award satisfaction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. encashment without protest accepts conditional offer. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. dd deposit constitutes acceptance under section 8. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. awards satisfied; summonses dismissed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER :
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
1. The two Chamber Summonses seek assistance in execution of the awards dated 22nd October 2012 and for deposit of the decretal amounts along with interest after respectively adjusting part of the amounts of Rs.5,11,113/- and Rs.13,51,740/- of the demand draft of Rs18,62,853/- received from the Judgment Debtors. The Applicant in the Execution Applications as well as in the Chamber Summonses is the assignor of the Decree holder who had loaned monies around 2010 to 2011 to the Judgment Debtors under two loan accounts : loan account no.RALPMUM000043150 amounting to INR 2,50,00,000/- and loan account no.RALPMUM000045338 amounting to INR 1,56,00,000/-. Since disputes arose between the parties on account of the two Judgment Debtors failing to service the loan, arbitral proceedings commenced. On 22nd October 2012, the awards were passed in the arbitral proceedings pertaining to both the loans. As regards the loan amount of Rs.1,56,00,000/-, the Judgment Debtors were directed to inter alia jointly and/or severally pay to the Claimant a sum of Rs.1,79,16,334.95 together with interest at the rate of 14.50 percent per annum from 21st April 2012 till payment or realization (the “Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan Award”) and as regards the loan amount of Rs.2,50,00,000/-, the Judgment Debtors were inter alia directed to jointly and/or severally pay to the Claimant a sum of Rs.2,75,53,436.78 together with interest thereon at the rate of 14.50 percent per annum from 11th April 2012 till payment or realization (the “Rs.2,50,00,000/-loan Award”).
2. The Judgment Debtors, thereafter, on 24th January 2013 preferred Arbitration Petition No.95 of 2013 impugning the Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan award and Arbitration Petition No.96 of 2013 impugning the Rs.2,50,00,000/- loan award.
3. Thereafter, on 13th August 2018 an email was sent on behalf of the Judgment Debtors to the Decree holder requesting for No Objection Certificate (NOC) with respect to a Car loan of Rs.17,40,000/- bearing Loan Agreement No.RLNCMUM000168211. The Applicant on 16th August 2018 addressed an email to the Judgment Debtors stating that since a Car loan was linked with the Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan, the NOC along with Form 35 could be released only after termination of both the loan accounts. In view of the said e-mail communication, on 31st August 2018, the Judgment Debtors filed Suit No.2353 of 2018 before the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, challenging the refusal of the Decree Holder to issue NOC for the car loan. On 24th November 2018, a common order dated 24th November 2018 was passed by this Court in the Arbitration Petitions reading down and altering the impugned awards so as to exclude the additional interest of 3 percent per annum. On 1st January 2019, the Decree holder’s Advocate addressed a letter to the Judgment Debtors calling upon them to pay the following revised amounts towards satisfaction of the awards (after considering discharged payments and computing interest) :
(i) 2.5 crore loan award : INR 1,47,80,329.33
(ii) 1.56 crore loan award : INR 96,89,207.33.
4. By letter dated 11th January 2019, the Advocate for the Judgment Debtors addressed the following letter attaching the demand draft for a sum of Rs.18,64,351/- towards full and final settlement of the captioned matter.



5. By letter dated 30th January 2019, the Advocate for the Decree holder addressed a communication to the Advocate for the Judgment Debtors in S.C.Suit No.2353 of 2018 enclosing the following documents including the NOC for the car loan :
(i) The indemnity letter

Encashment of demand draft offered in full and final settlement without prior protest constitutes acceptance by conduct under Section 8, Indian Contract Act, satisfying the awards; subsequent protest....
Payment recognized under decree requires unconditional compliance; bank guarantees do not suffice, and interest continues until funds are available to the decree holder.
Conditional compromise decrees require fulfillment of specific obligations for enforceability; failure to comply renders them unenforceable.
Consent decrees are binding and enforceable, and courts can dispense mandatory notice for execution to prevent undue delay if justice requires it.
Execution of an arbitral award requires compliance with the 90-day limitation under Section 34; execution petitions filed before this period are impermissible.
The court ruled that an unsubstantiated claim for set off cannot affect the enforceability of an arbitral award, and interest on decreed amounts runs from the date the claim arose.
A decree's joint liability cannot be severed or modified unilaterally; the recording of payments must meet procedural standards set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure.
Interest ceased to run on the deposited amount after the dismissal of FAO No. 284/2005 on 04.12.2008.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.