SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited - Applicant
Versus 
Hiroo Hotchand Advani And Another - Respondents
Chamber Summons No.550 Of 2019, Commercial Execution Application No.43 Of 2025, Chamber Summons No.552 Of 2019 In Commercial Execution Application No.44 Of 2025
Decided On : 23-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr.Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Nikhil Rajani, Mr.Vinay Deshpande, Mr.Ajay Deshmane i/by M/s.V.Deshpande & Co., Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr.Pankaj Savant, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms.Joshua D’Souza, Mr.Chirag Sancheti, Mr.Asif Lampwala, Mr.Saad Memon i/by Bulwark Solicitors, Advocate

Encashment of demand draft offered in full and final settlement without prior protest constitutes acceptance by conduct under Section 8, Indian Contract Act, satisfying the awards; subsequent protest ineffective.

Headnote:(A) Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 6 and 8 - Full and final settlement - Encashment of demand draft tendered towards full and final settlement without prior protest or communication of non-acceptance constitutes unequivocal acceptance by conduct - Offeree cannot accept benefit while rejecting condition or approbate and reprobate - Subsequent protest after encashment ineffective as proposal irrevocable post-acceptance - Arbitral awards held completely satisfied. (Paras 14 to 19)

Facts of the case:
Arbitral awards passed directing judgment debtors to pay principal loan amounts of Rs.2,50,00,000/- and Rs.1,56,00,000/- with interest at 14.50% p.a. - Awards modified excluding additional 3% interest - Judgment debtors tendered demand draft of Rs.18,64,351/- under letter claiming it as full and final settlement based on revised dues - Decree holder issued NOCs for linked car loan, later encashed demand draft on 30th March 2019 under protest claiming incorrect calculations, and initiated execution - Dispute whether payment satisfied awards.

Findings of Court:
Tender of Rs.18,64,351/- under full and final settlement letter resulted in complete satisfaction of awards upon encashment without prior protest.

Issues: Whether encashment of demand draft offered in full and final settlement, followed by post-encashment protest, constitutes acceptance leading to satisfaction of arbitral awards in execution proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: What is offered on condition must be taken as offered; encashment without prior rejection assumes acceptance under Section 8; post-encashment protest cannot revoke or alter position as offeror cannot be restored; offeree must communicate non-acceptance before realizing payment.

Result: Chamber summonses dismissed; arbitral awards marked satisfied; execution applications disposed.

Table of Content
1. arbitral awards for loan recovery with interest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. demand draft tendered for full settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court directs decision on award satisfaction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. encashment without protest accepts conditional offer. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. dd deposit constitutes acceptance under section 8. (Para 18 , 19)
6. awards satisfied; summonses dismissed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

ORDER :

ABHAY AHUJA, J.

1. The two Chamber Summonses seek assistance in execution of the awards dated 22nd October 2012 and for deposit of the decretal amounts along with interest after respectively adjusting part of the amounts of Rs.5,11,113/- and Rs.13,51,740/- of the demand draft of Rs18,62,853/- received from the Judgment Debtors. The Applicant in the Execution Applications as well as in the Chamber Summonses is the assignor of the Decree holder who had loaned monies around 2010 to 2011 to the Judgment Debtors under two loan accounts : loan account no.RALPMUM000043150 amounting to INR 2,50,00,000/- and loan account no.RALPMUM000045338 amounting to INR 1,56,00,000/-. Since disputes arose between the parties on account of the two Judgment Debtors failing to service the loan, arbitral proceedings commenced. On 22nd October 2012, the awards were passed in the arbitral proceedings pertaining to both the loans. As regards the loan amount of Rs.1,56,00,000/-, the Judgment Debtors were directed to inter alia jointly and/or severally pay to the Claimant a sum of Rs.1,79,16,334.95 together with interest at the rate of 14.50 percent per annum from 21st April 2012 till payment or realization (the “Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan Award”) and as regards the loan amount of Rs.2,50,00,000/-, the Judgment Debtors were inter alia directed to jointly and/or severally pay to the Claimant a sum of Rs.2,75,53,436.78 together with interest thereon at the rate of 14.50 percent per annum from 11th April 2012 till payment or realization (the “Rs.2,50,00,000/-loan Award”).

2. The Judgment Debtors, thereafter, on 24th January 2013 preferred Arbitration Petition No.95 of 2013 impugning the Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan award and Arbitration Petition No.96 of 2013 impugning the Rs.2,50,00,000/- loan award.

3. Thereafter, on 13th August 2018 an email was sent on behalf of the Judgment Debtors to the Decree holder requesting for No Objection Certificate (NOC) with respect to a Car loan of Rs.17,40,000/- bearing Loan Agreement No.RLNCMUM000168211. The Applicant on 16th August 2018 addressed an email to the Judgment Debtors stating that since a Car loan was linked with the Rs.1,56,00,000/- loan, the NOC along with Form 35 could be released only after termination of both the loan accounts. In view of the said e-mail communication, on 31st August 2018, the Judgment Debtors filed Suit No.2353 of 2018 before the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, challenging the refusal of the Decree Holder to issue NOC for the car loan. On 24th November 2018, a common order dated 24th November 2018 was passed by this Court in the Arbitration Petitions reading down and altering the impugned awards so as to exclude the additional interest of 3 percent per annum. On 1st January 2019, the Decree holder’s Advocate addressed a letter to the Judgment Debtors calling upon them to pay the following revised amounts towards satisfaction of the awards (after considering discharged payments and computing interest) :

(i) 2.5 crore loan award : INR 1,47,80,329.33

(ii) 1.56 crore loan award : INR 96,89,207.33.

4. By letter dated 11th January 2019, the Advocate for the Judgment Debtors addressed the following letter attaching the demand draft for a sum of Rs.18,64,351/- towards full and final settlement of the captioned matter.

5. By letter dated 30th January 2019, the Advocate for the Decree holder addressed a communication to the Advocate for the Judgment Debtors in S.C.Suit No.2353 of 2018 enclosing the following documents including the NOC for the car loan :

(i) The indemnity letter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top