SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 223

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
Suvarna, W/o. Popat Sable - Petitioner
Versus
The Chief Executive Officer, Women and Child Development Development - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 1404 OF 2024
Decided On : 13-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl.GP, Mr. A. D. Aghav, Advocate

Submission of Gram Sevak certificate, self-declaration, Aadhaar and Ration Cards suffices for residency proof in Anganwadi recruitment despite discrepant EPIC; disqualification on vague hearsay inquiry invalid.

Headnote:(A) Integrated Child Development Services Scheme - Recruitment for Anganwadi Sevika post - Residency requirement under advertisement clause 4(2) - Candidate must submit certificate by Gram Sevak, self-declaration certificate, and one of Aadhaar Card/Ration Card/EPIC Card - Submission of Gram Sevak certificate, self-declaration, Aadhaar Card and Ration Card showing residency in concerned village sufficient to prove eligibility despite EPIC Card indicating different address as prior part of same village - Only one of three documents required; two compliant documents satisfy criteria - Authorities' disqualification based on vague report relying on hearsay, physical visit observations, and unconsidered panchnama set aside as petitioner ranked second in merit list after top candidate disqualified for age - Delay in filling post deprecated as frustrating scheme purpose for child development in rural areas. (Paras 6, 20-27)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner participated in selection for Anganwadi Sevika post, secured second position in merit list after top candidate disqualified on age grounds, submitted required residency proofs including Gram Sevak certificate, self-declaration, Aadhaar Card and Ration Card showing concerned village address, but EPIC showed prior combined village name; complaint led to inquiry finding dual residency based on hearsay and visit, disqualifying petitioner; appeals to higher authorities dismissed.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner met residency requirement with requisite documents; authorities' inquiry vague, unsupported by evidence challenging submitted certificates; no basis to demand all three documents match; post still vacant despite selection in 2022.

Issues: Whether petitioner satisfied residency criterion based on submitted documents and whether authorities' disqualification on inquiry findings was valid.

Ratio Decidendi: Advertisement requires only one identity document alongside Gram Sevak certificate and self-declaration to prove village residency; compliant documents prevail over discrepant one and unsubstantiated hearsay inquiry; prompt appointment essential for scheme's child welfare objectives in rural areas. Result : Writ petition allowed; authorities directed to appoint petitioner to post within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. procedural rules issued and hearing conducted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. icds scheme regulated by government resolutions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. local residency required; petitioner selected second. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. disqualification upheld on residency inquiry. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. documents sufficiently prove padoshi residency. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. inquiry and panchnama confirm sherewadi residence. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
7. one valid document suffices for residency proof. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
8. immediate appointment ordered; delay deprecated. (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2. Heard finally with consent of Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.3 and Mr. A. D. Aghav, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2.

3. Integrated Child Development Services Scheme is a benevolent scheme introduced by the Central Government. Under this scheme the State Government particularly in rural areas has created various posts such as Anganwadi Sevika, Mini Anganwadi Sevika to promote education and child development. These posts are filled on an honorarium basis. Under the schemes projects are undertaken by the Zilla Parishad through Child Development Project Officers.

4. The scheme is implemented in the State through different projects. Some projects are meant for the rural and Adiwasi areas and some projects are for urban areas within the State. Since after issuance of Government Resolution dated 09.02.2005, the State Government has improved the schemes and its implementation by issuing various Government Resolutions from time to time.

5. The relevant Government Resolution modifying and setting the service conditions of the employees of Anganwadi is framed vide Government Resolution dated 13.08.2014. The said Government Resolution prescribes the qualifications required for such appointments and identifies the authorities responsible for recruitment, as well as for raising the grievance arising from the selection procedure. The said Government Resolution is a part of the present Writ Petition paper book at page no.52.

6. An advertisement was published on 27.07.2022 by respondent no.2 for filling up one post of Anganwadi Sevika/Helper at the Anganwadi Center, Padoshi, located at village Padoshi, Tq. Akole, District Ahilyanagar. A number of candidates including the petitioner participated in the selection process. It is pertinent to note that clause no.4(2) of the advertisement required that the candidate must be a resident of the village in which the subject matter Anganwadi center is located. In order to prove the residence, a candidate was required to submit a certificate issued by the concerned Gram Sevak alongwith a self declaration certificate to that effect. Additionally, a copy of Aadhaar Card/EPIC Card/Ration Card was also required to be submitted.

7. The petitioner possessed a Ration Card pertaining to village Padoshi wherein her name is incorporated as daughter- in-law of the Ration Card holder Shivram Sable. It is not in dispute that this Ration Card was issued prior to the date of the subject matter/advertisement. Copy of the Ration Card is at page no.20 and 21 of the paper book. The petitioner also submitted a copy of her Aadhaar Card bearing No.2631 5671 3978. Suffice to note that the address of the petitioner is also shown at Padoshi, Tq. Akole, Dist. Ahmednagar. The petitioner fairly submits that EPIC Card held by her on the date of filing her application indicated her address as resident of Padoshi Sherewadi. Petitioner submits that at the relevant time the village was identified as Padoshi Sherewadi. The portion Sherewadi was later segregated by the State. However, subsequently in the month of August, 2023, the residence of the petitioner was corrected showing her residence at Padoshi.

8. It appears that after due selection procedure, the select list was prepared by the concern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top