SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 66

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
AJIT B.KADETHANKAR, J.
Jyoti w/o Ravindra Sable - Appellant
Vs.
The Chief Executive Officer, Women and Child Development, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, Taluka & District: Ahmednagar - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 1422 of 2024 
Decided On : 01-04-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl.GP, Mr. A. D. Aghav, Advocate Mr. N. K. Chaudhari, Advocate

Submitted residency documents like Ration Card, Aadhaar suffice if genuine; post-appointment hearsay inquiry without cogent proof cannot override them to disqualify appointee.

Headnote:(A) Integrated Child Development Services Scheme - Anganwadi Sevika appointment - Residency requirement under advertisement clause 4(2) - Candidate must submit Gram Sevak certificate, self-declaration, and Aadhaar/Ration/EPIC Card - Genuineness of documents not disputed - Such documents sufficiently prove residency at relevant time - Post-appointment inquiry relying on hearsay information that candidate resided on rental basis after advertisement, son's studies in adjoining village, and undated xerox panchnama (self-incriminating and disputed) held vague and insufficient to disqualify - Removal without meaningful inquiry and independent application of mind quashed - Reinstatement directed. (Paras 3, 4.4-4.6, 8.3-8.12, 8.14-8.17)

(B) Administrative inquiry against documentary evidence - Must be cautious, based on cogent proof like landlord statements - Hearsay or opinion alone inadequate - Rental residence not disqualifying unless non-residency on advertisement date established - Authorities cannot casually terminate after initial scrutiny and appointment. (Paras 8.8-8.11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner topped merit for Anganwadi Sevika post, submitted residency documents including pre-advertisement Ration Card, Aadhaar and EPIC Cards showing village address, Gram Sevak certificate. Appointed. Complaint by runner-up led to CDPO inquiry reporting hearsay non-residency and panchnama findings. CEO disqualified petitioner; appellate authority affirmed.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner's documents validly proved residency; CDPO report defective; panchnama unreliable; no cogent disproof of documents.

Issues: Whether submitted documents suffice for residency proof; validity of disqualification based on post-selection hearsay and panchnama; need for independent mind in termination.

Ratio Decidendi: Documentary evidence submitted in selection process holds primacy; cannot be displaced by vague hearsay inquiry or unreliable panchnama without establishing non-residency at crucial date through proper investigation.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2. Heard for final disposal with consent of Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.3, Mr. A. D. Aghav, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. N. K. Chaudhari, learned Counsel for respondent no.4.

3 . Subject-matter :

Petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Sevika at Padoshi village after due process corresponding to her topper position in the merit. Place of residence is the crucial condition for appointment on the subject-matter post. Petitioner qualified the crucial condition by producing requisite documents. Respondent No.4 complained that Petitioner was residing at Padoshi on rental basis since after issuance of advertisement. That, Petitioner’s son was studying in Anganwadi in the adjoining village. On the basis of such complaint, Petitioner came to be removed from the subject- matter post. As such, Petitioner’s removal is under challenge in this Writ Petition.

4 . Facts in brief:

4.1. Integrated Child Development Services Scheme is a benevolent scheme introduced by the Central Government. Under this scheme the State Government particularly in rural areas has created various posts such as Anganwadi Sevika, Mini Anganwadi Sevika to promote education and child development. These posts are filled on an honorarium basis. Under the schemes projects are undertaken by the Zilla Parishad through Child Development Project Officers.

4.2. The scheme is implemented in the State through different projects. Some projects are meant for the rural and Adiwasi areas and some projects are for urban areas within the State. Since after issuance of Government Resolution dated 09.02.2005, the State Government has improved the schemes and its implementation by issuing various Government Resolutions from time to time.

4.3. The relevant Government Resolution modifying and setting the service conditions of the employees of Anganwadi is framed vide Government Resolution dated 13.08.2014. The said Government Resolution prescribes the qualifications required for such appointments and identifies the authorities responsible for recruitment, as well as for raising the grievance arising from the selection procedure. The said Government Resolution is a part of the present Writ Petition paper book at page no.63.

4.4. An advertisement was published on 27.07.2022 by respondent no.2 for filling up one post of Anganwadi Sevika/Helper at the Anganwadi Center, Padoshi, located at village Padoshi, Tq. Akole, District Ahilyanagar. A number of candidates including the petitioner participated in the selection process. It is pertinent to note that clause no.4(2) of the advertisement required that the candidate must be a resident of the village in which the subject matter Anganwadi center is located. In order to prove the residence, a candidate was required to submit a certificate issued by the concerned Gram Sevak alongwith a self declaration certificate to that effect. Additionally, a copy of Aadhaar Card/EPIC Card/Ration Card was also required to be submitted.

4.5. The petitioner possessed a Ration Card pertaining to village Padoshi wherein her name is incorporated. It is not in dispute that this Ration Card was issued prior to the date of the subject matter/advertisement. Copy of the Ration Card is at page no.27 of the paper book. The petitioner also submitted a copy of her Aadhaar Card bearing No.3742 3829 2686. Suffice to note that the address of the petitioner is also shown at Padoshi, Tq. Akole, Dist. Ahmednagar. The Aadhar Card is issued on 17.01.2014. EPIC card of the Petitioner also showed her address at Padoshi.

4.6. It appears that after due selection procedure, the select list was prepared by the concerned selection committee and the petitioner was shown at serial no.1 on merits. Accordingly, the Petitioner came to be appointed on the subject matter post.

4.7. Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top