SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Surya Kant Pramjeet Singh, R.P.Nagrath
Tata Steel Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Atma Tube Products Ltd – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner in CRM 790-MA-2010:Mr. H.L. Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumeet Goel and Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocates.
For the Petitioner in CRM-A-547-MA-2011:Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Pardeep S. Poonia, Addl. AG Haryana, Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG Haryana and Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG Haryana.
For the Respondents: Mr. Amit Rawal Addl. AG Punjab, Ms Manjari Nehru Kaul, Addl. AG Punjab, Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG Punjab, and Mr. Deep Singh, AAG Punjab.
For the Respondent in CRM-736-MA-2011:Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top