Central Bureau of Investigation VS Bhupen Champaklal Dalal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ROSHAN DALVI
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Bhupen Champaklal Dalal – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the CBI: Mr. R. S. Mahamane, Special P.P.
For the Accused No.1:Mr. Sunil Kale a/w. Mr. Manoj Shukla, Advocate.
For the Accused No.2:Mr. D. U. Mirajkar, Advocate.
For Accused No.4:Mr. Vijay Garg a/w. Ms. Sheetal Ghulane i/b Pandya & Gandhi & Co., Advocate.
For the Accused No.11:Mr. Anil Galgali, Advocate.
For the Accused No.13:Mr. A. M. Vernekar, Advocate.
For the Accused Nos.15 & 16:Mr. Jaideep Lele i/b Bharat Rathod, Advocate.

******** Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

ROSHAN DALVICentral Bureau of Investigation – AppellantVersusBhupen Champaklal Dalal – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

ROSHAN DALVI
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Bhupen Champaklal Dalal – Respondent