SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S. K. PANIGRAHI
Santosh Kumar Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner Mr. Debasnan Das, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: Mr. D. Mund, AGA

ORDER

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking for bail in connection with Nimapara P.S Case No.29 of 2020 under Section 344/376(2)(n)/506/109 of the I.P.C corresponding to G.R Case No. 85 (A) of 2020 pending before the court of Learned J.M.F.C Nimapara.

I. Case of the Prosecution

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.01.20, at about 10A.M, the present petitioner took the victim from her house to Bhubaneswar with a promise to marry her. The present petitioner maintained physical relationship with the victim for several days and later, abandoned her. After getting information from the victim, her father and brother proceeded to Bhubaneswar and rescued her. It is further alleged that on 03.02.2020 when the father of the informant brought such fact to the notice of the father of the present petitioner, the latter abused them and also threatened with dire consequences in case such fact is reported to the local police.

II. Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner

4. It is submitted by Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that admittedly, the victim in the present case is a major a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top