SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Pat) 216

HARI LAL AGRAWAL, SHIVESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, BRISHKETU SARAN SINHA
Bibi Amna Khatun – Appellant
Versus
Zahir Hussain – Respondent


Judgment

HARI LAL AGRAWAL, J.

1. This Civil revision application having been referred to a larger Bench by a Division Bench has been placed before us. The Division Bench has expressed its doubt regarding the correctness of a Bench decision of this Court in the case of Ranchhod Lodha V/s. Madhabji Kanji (AIR 1974 Pat 211).

2. The provision of law falling for our consideration is Sec.11A of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947, which has since already vexed this Court time without number. This time we have to consider the effect of withdrawal of the rent deposited out of time by the landlord on his right to get the defence of the tenant against his ejectment struck off.

3. Before adverting to the question posed before us, I will very briefly state the relevant facts. The opposite party instituted a title suit for eviction of one Md. Ibrahim, the ancestor of the petitioners (who were substituted in the lower appellate Court) from a house in the town of Chapra. The suit having been dismissed by the trial court the opposite party filed the appeal. There on 1-5-1967, an application under Sec. 11A was filed by the opposite party, which was allowed on 10-1-1966.


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top