M. R. SHAH, ASHUTOSH KUMAR, MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
Mukesh R. Shah, J.
At the outset it is required to be noted that having not agreed with the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar Tiwary and Others. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors reported in, (2008) 2 PLJR 265 vide order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in present Letters Patent Appeal No. 676 of 2010 and L.P.A. No. 332 of 2010 dated 11.05.2010 both these appeals are referred to the Full Bench. 1.1. At the outset it is required to be noted that in the case of Sanjay Kumar Tiwary and Others. (supra) the Division Bench of this Court has observed and held that in a case of termination of a casual worker on daily wage, in view of Section 2(oo) of Clause (bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "the I.D. Act"), the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act shall not be attracted and an employer terminating the employment of such worker is not required to serve notice, pay compensation etc. In the case of Sanjay Kumar Tiwary and Others. (supra) after referring the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Umadevi (3) and Others reported in, (2006) 4 S
Tiwary and Others. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors reported in
State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Umadevi (3) and Others reported in
Shankariah Vs. K.S.R.T.C. reported in
Allahabad Bank Vs. Prem Singh reported in
Municipal Council, Samrala Vs. Raj Kumar reported in
Rastriya Uchh Path Anchal, Muzaffarpur Vs. P.W.D. Workers Union reported in
Rattan Singh Vs. Union of India and another reported in
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. A. Sankaralingam reported in
S.M. Nilajkar and Others Vs. Telecom District Manager, Karnataka reported in
Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh reported in
Hari Nandan Prasad Vs. Food Corporation of India reported in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.