IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Sanjay Karol, S. Kumar, JJ.
State Of Bihar - Appellant
Versus
Ajit Kumar, S/o Gautam Prasad - Respondent
Death Reference No. 3 of 2018; Criminal Appeal No. 888 of 2018
Decided On : 20-10-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and charges against the accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. legal standards for circumstantial evidence. (Para 10 , 36 , 38 , 89) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding evidence and credibility. (Para 11 , 62) |
| 4. court's considerations about the trial proceedings. (Para 12 , 74 , 120) |
| 5. final judgment and release order. (Para 124 , 125 , 126) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Karol, C.J. - Accused Ajit Kumar and Vishal Kumar enticed and kidnapped the prosecutrix (hereinafter referred to as ''the deceased''), a minor girl, from the guardianship of her parents residing in Village Pipra (Bihar) and took her first to Patna (Bihar) and then to Vadodara (Gujarat) where she was subjected to gang rape and burnt to death.
2. In crux, this is the case of the prosecution, concerning which accused Ajit Kumar stands convicted for committing an offence punishable under Sections 363 , 366A, 120B, 302, 376(D) of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and Section 6 (g) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "POCSO Act, 2012).
3. Concerning an offence under Section 302 I.P.C., the accused stands sentenced to be hanged by the neck till his death. No separate sentence about the other crimes stands passed.
4. Resultantly, Death Reference No. 03 of 2018, titled as The State of Bihar Vs. Ajit Kumar is before us for confirmation of such a sentence of death.
5. The accused has challenged the correctness of the findings returned, the judgment of conviction; and the sentence, vide connected Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 888 of 2018 titled as Ajit Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar.
6. It is the prosecution case that on 19th April 2017, Amir Imamul Haque Hemja (P.W.3) informed the police at Police Station Manjhagarh, Gopalganj district (Bihar) that since 10th March 2017 his daughter, i.e. the deceased (name concealed), was missing. Two persons namely accused Ajit Kumar and Vishal Kumar, on the pretext of solemnizing marriage allured her to travel with them from Bihar to Gujarat where she was subjected to torture and accused Ajit Kumar subjected her to sexual assault prompting her to set herself on fire on 19th April 2017, which version stands improvised by the complainant that the accused set her on fire. On 20th April 2017, officials of the Police Station, Manjhagarh (Bihar) informed him of the death of his daughter who died of burn injuries. He travelled to Vadodara (Gujarat) with his relatives Md. Imran Ali and Kamran Ali and identified the dead body of the deceased. Based on a signed statement of Amir Hamja (P.W.3), the police lodged U.D. Case No. 25 of 2017 at Makarpura Police Station, Vadodara (Gujarat) which subsequently stood transferred to Police Station Manjhagarh (Bihar) where F.I.R. No. 67 of 2017 dated 29th April 2017 was registered. The investigation was carried out both in Gujarat and Bihar and charge-sheet presented in the Court on 24th April 2017 only against accused Ajit Kumar with investigation qua other accused Vishal Kumar and Govind Prasad also involved in the crime, kept pending.
7. On 30th August 2017, the Trial Judge charged Ajit Kumar for having committed offences punishable under the INDIAN PENAL CODE and the POCSO Act, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
8. The chart showing the Sections of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and the POCSO Act is given below: -
| FIR under Sections | Charge-sheet under sections | Charge under sections |
| 363, 366, 376, 306, 114 I.P.C. & 4/8/12 of the POCSO Act | 363, 366(A), 376, 302, 120B, 34 I.P.C. & 4/8/12 of the POCSO Act | 363/34, 366(A)/ 34. 120B, 302/ 34. 376(D) I.P.C. & 6 (G) POCSO Act. |
9. For establishing the guilt of the accused, in all, the prosecution examined six witnesses.
10. The trial court found the statements of the witnesses to be inspiring in confidence; beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt; and there being nothing on record "to di
Aghnoo Nagesia vs. State of Bihar
Allauddin Mian vs. State of Bihar
Anjan Kumar Sarma vs. State of Assam
Ashok Debbarma vs. State of Tripura
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Baiju Kumar Soni vs. State of Jharkhand
Balram Prasad Agrawal vs. State of Bihar
Balwant Singh vs. State of Punjab
Basavaraj R Patil vs. State of Karnataka
Bhagwan Dass vs. State (NCT) of Delhi
Bodhraj alias Bodha vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Chandmal vs. State of Rajasthan
Charandas Swami vs. State of Gujarat
Dharmendrasinh vs. State of Gujarat
Ganpat Singh vs. State of M.P.
Gurpreet Singh vs. State of Haryana
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar vs. State of M.P.
Ishwari Lal Yadav vs. State of Chhattisgarh
IshwariLalYadav vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Jagdish Narain vs. State of U.P.
Jagmohan Singh vs. State of UP
Kailash Gour vs. State of Assam
Kali Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Kalyan Kumar Gogoi vs. Ashutosh Agnihotri
Khushwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
Kuldip Singh vs. State of Delhi
Lallu Manji vs. State of Jharkhand
Limbaji and Ors vs. State of Maharashtra
Macchi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Maheshwar Tigga vs. State of Jharkhand
Mithu Singh vs. State of Punjab
Mohd Hussain vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)
Motilal vs. State of Rajasthan
Musheer Khan vs. State of M.P.
Nav Singh vs. State of Haryana
Naval Kishore Singh vs. State of Bihar
Om Prakash vs. State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand
Parminder Kaur vs. State of Punjab
Raj Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajender vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Rajendra Prasad vs. State of UP
Ram Chander vs. State of Haryana
Ramesh Harijan vs. State of U.P.
Ravi vs. The State of Maharashtra
Rumi Bora Dutta vs. State of Assam
Sandesh vs. State of Maharashtra
Santosh Kumar Sarish Bhushan Bariar
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade vs. State of Maharashtra
State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru
State of A.P. vs. Vasudeva Rao
State of Karnataka vs. J. Jayalalitha
State of Maharashtra vs. Sukhdev Singh
State of Punjab vs. Dalbir Singh
State of Punjab vs. Gurnam Kaur
State of U.P. vs. Wasif Haider
State of UP vs. Deoman Upadhyay
Sudam vs. State of Maharashtra
Sujit Biswas vs. State of Assam
Suresh Budharmal Kalani vs. State of Maharashtra
Sushil Sharma vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Swamy Shraddananda (2) vs. State of Karnataka
Vashram Narshibhai Rajpara vs. State of Gujarat
Vsanta Sampat Dupare vs. State of Maharashtra
Vsanta Sampat Dupare vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.