SANJAY KAROL, S. KUMAR
Shivani Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Karol, C.J. - This order is in continuation of our order No.19 dated 12.05.2021.
2. The Constitution Bench (Five Judge) of the Hon ble Apex Court in State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Union of India, (2018) 8 SCC 501 , while elaborately dealing with the concepts of democracy; democratic spirit; representative participation; constitutional morality and values; constitutional governance and executives; parliamentary democracy and collective responsibility of cabinet; democracy and federalism; constitutional objectivity; constitutional responsibility; collaborative federalism; pragmatic federalism; constitutional renaissance, inter alia observed that:
.....The main purpose of a representative Government is to represent the public will, perception and the popular sentiment into policies. The representatives, thus, act on behalf of the people at large and remain accountable to the people for their activities as lawmakers. Therefore, representative form of governance comes out as a device to bring to fore the popular will. The Constitution of India has embraced the representative model of governance at all levels i.e. local, State and the Union. Thus perceived, the people are the sov
Anjali Bhardwaj vs. Union of India
Cellular Operators Assn. of India vs. TRAI
Chief Information Commr. vs. State of Manipur
Girish Mittal vs. Parvati V. Sundaram
Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers, Bombay Pvt. Ltd.
Reserve Bank of India vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry
State NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India
The Registrar's authority to register deaths is not limited by territorial boundaries if the deceased was a resident in the relevant jurisdiction during their lifetime.
Right to Information - Power and accountability go hand in hand - Public accountability is a crucial feature that governs relationship between 'duty bearers' and 'right holders' - Special power of 'M....
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is not restricted to citizens alone and that non-citizens can also seek information under the Act.
The imposition of penalties under Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, is contingent upon proving a malafide intent on the part of the Public Information Officer; in the absence of such ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.