SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 442

P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAJIV ROY
Subodh Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Uday Prakash Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. Suman Kumar Jha.

Rajiv Roy, J.—The present appeal has been preferred for setting aside the order dated 06.08.2021 passed in CWJC No. 19387 of 2017 by learned Single Judge (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah) whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge has been pleased to dismiss the writ application on the ground that neither any candidate having lesser marks than that of the petitioner in the Backward category nor any candidate having lesser marks than the cut-off marks in their respective category in the Mains (written) examination have been declared successful with further observation that the private respondents no. 6 and 8 namely Puja Bharti and Priyanka Kumari have qualified under their own category, i.e. backward class women category.

2. The facts relating to the present case is/are as follows:—

On 19.10.2011, the Bihar Public Service Commission (henceforth for short “the BPSC”) issued Advertisement No. 42/2011 for appointment to the post of Assistant Prosecution Officer (henceforth for short “the APO”). The appellant-petitioner was one of the applicant pursuant to the said advertisement under the OBC category.

The examination was conducted in the year 2015 and the petitioner secured 498

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top