SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1747

SHIVAJI PANDEY
Santosh Kumar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Subhrao Sanyal.
For the Bank : Mr. Sanjiv Kumar.

Shivaji Pandey, J. – Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the enquiry report dated 30.11.2016 issued by the Chief Manager (Enquiry), the order dated 31.1.2017 passed by the Regional Manager & Disciplinary Authority, RBO, Madhubani and the appellate order dated 6.5.2017 passed by the Deputy General Manager (B & O) and the Appellate Authority, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner has been dismissed from service.

3. The petitioner had joined the service in the year 2009, was posted as an Assistant at Dagmara Branch of the State Bank of India and, soon thereafter, he was transferred to Nirmali Branch but his I.D. was not activated to work on CBS Platform. Even after several requests, the I.D. of the petitioner was not activated but, later on, the petitioner was again transferred to the Dagmara Branch of the Bank where his I.D. was activated. The petitioner was assigned the job of cash in-charge, having claimed by the petitioner that he had no experience either of working on CBS platform or on the job of Cash In-charge. As has been claimed by the petitioner that the Branch was very active branch whereas the system was not functioning prop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top