SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 909

P. B. BAJANTHRI, PURNENDU SINGH
Atul Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.D. Yadav (Aag 9).

Service Law – Compassionate Appointment – Civil death of employee – Presumption of adoption can be rebutted when adoptive son is described as son of his natural father – Civil death can be declared only by a competent Civil Court in a separate suit – Civil court has power to grant declaratory relief of civil death of a person who goes missing for more than seven years – Information and report of S.H.O. with regard to missing of deceased employee only has evidentiary value and appellant was required to obtain a decree of civil death by a competent Civil Court – Family sustained from year 2001 to 2008 and appellant has no fundamental right to claim compassionate appointment – Appellant has not produced adoption deed before competent authority and is depending upon succession certificate – Succession Certificate has been granted without examining biological father and mother of Appellant – Object of compassionate appointment is to meet immediate harness in family – Compassionate appointment is not to be used as an alternate remedy for securing employment – Court cannot issue direction to respondents contrary to scheme adopted by them – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top