SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 894

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Dhananjay Kumar, Abhinav Pandey.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ramchandra Singh, APP.

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.—The present appeal preferred by appellant/ convict Amit Kumar against judgment of conviction dated 02.12.2022 and the impugned order of sentence dated 05.12.2022 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge VII-cum-Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO Act), Patna, in CIS No. Special (POCSO) Case No. 30 of 2019, arising out of Bihta P.S. Case No. 214 of 2019 whereby and whereunder the appellant/convict has been convicted for the offences under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) for the offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and in default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo two months of R.I.

2. The crux of prosecution case, as it appears from the written information of the informant, namely, Pinki Devi (PW-3) that the accused/appellant was giving tuition to her daughter aged about 6 years since last three years usually between 4-5 P.M. at her house. On 23.02.2019 appellant was teaching to her daughter and son alongwith three other childrens of locality as usual. In due course of teaching, he asked h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top