Ashutosh Kumar, J. – Heard Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned senior advocate for the appellant and Mr. Piyush Lall, learned advocate for the High Court.

2. The appellant has questioned the judgment dated 20.09.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13012 of 2014 by the learned single Judge of this Court whereby his appointment has been cancelled and in his place, one Mukesh Kumar/respondent no.5 has been directed to be appointed against an advertisement for appointment on Class-IV post in the judgeship of Saran at Chapra dated 28.04.20211. In the advertisement, the percentage of reservation for various Classes was declared and for the Backward Class, to which category appellant belonged, was given 12% reservation.

3. The respondent no.5/writ petitioner was not selected as the appellant had been placed at serial no.1 in the Backward Class Category having obtained 21 marks. Under the directions of the High Court, a wait list but was prepared with representation of various categories in which the respondent no.5 was placed at serial no.1.

4. The respondent no.5 was content with his not being employed against the appointment process, referred to above, but when he learnt that the appellant could not ha