SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Md. Raushan – Appellant
Versus
Tanweer Alam – Respondent
SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This Civil Misc. Application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 30-01-2018 passed by Learned Execution Munsif, Gaya in Execution case No. 10 of 2005 whereby and whereunder the petition dated 24.01.2018 of the petitioner / objector to stay the proceeding of execution case till the disposal of title suit bearing No. 3 of 2018 was rejected.
3. Respondent No. 01 (Decree-holder) had filed a Eviction Suit No. 02 of 2004 (1 of 2000) in the Court of Munsif- 1st, Gaya for eviction of Scheduled property and after hearing both parties, the suit has been decreed in favour of the Respondent No. 1/ Decree-holder on 13-04-2005. The Respondent No.1 as Decree holder filed the Execution Case No. 10 of 2005 against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Judgment Debtors) for delivery of vacant possession over the tenanted portion (5 rooms pucca house occupied by Judgment Debtors) of the suit property in which delivery of possession has been issued.
4. The claim of the petitioner / objector is that out of five rooms in the ground floor of suit premises two rooms are under the possession of Respondent No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.