SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 407

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJIV ROY
Krishna Mohan Ravidas – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Sanjeev Kumar, Shyamal Prakash.
For the State : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP.

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.:–Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Bihar.

2. By the impugned judgment of conviction dated 17.08.2021 and the order of sentence dated 25.08.2021, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special Judge, POCSO Nalanda at Biharsharif in POCSO/GR Case No. 118 of 2019 arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 183 of 2019, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction under Section

Imprisonment

Sentence Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Under Section 6 of the POCSO Act

Rigorous Imprisonment for 25 years

10,000/-

SI for 6 months

3. We have heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sujeet Kumar Singh learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

4. The mother of minor victim girl is the informant on whose written statement, the concerned Mahila P.S. Case No. 183/2019 came to be registered on 16.11.2019 for the offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top