SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 311

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
Youth For Equality – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Aprajita Singh, Sr. Adv., Abhinav Shrivastava, Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Rahul Pratap, Raushan, Krishna Murari, Arpit Anand, Pushkar Bharadwaj (in 5542); Dinu Kumar, Ritika Rani, Vardaan Mangalam, Rituraj (in 4624); Yadunandan Bansal, Avinash Kumar Pandey, Upender Kumar (in 4650); Abhinav Shrivastava, Karandeep Kumar (in 5749); M.P.Dixit, S.K.Dixit, Swastika, Sanjay Kumar Chaubey (in 6506, 7297).
For the Resp.-State : M/s P.K. Shahi, AG, Anjani Kumar, AAG-4, Sanjiv Kumar, AC to AG, Alok Kr. Rahi, AC to AAG 4, Manish Kumar, Shailendra Kumar Singh, Utkarsh Bhushan (in 5542).
For the Respondents: M/s Kalpana (in 4624, 6506, 7297); Dr. K.N.Singh, ASG(in 4650); Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG., (in 4624, 5749, 6506, 7297); Naresh Dikshit(in 6506, 7297).
For the Intervenor : M/s Basant Kumar Choudhary, Sr. Adv., (in person), Shashi Bhushan Kumar (in 5542).

K. Vinod Chandran, CJ.—The action of the State in carrying out a caste survey, impugned in the present batch of writ petitions and the vigorous challenge raised to it on multiple grounds, inter alia of infringement of fundamental rights, by reason of infringement of privacy, reveal that despite attempts to efface it from the social fabric, caste remains a reality and refuses to be swept aside, wished away or brushed aside nor does it wither away and disperse into thin air.

THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE SURVEY:—

2. Learned Senior Counsel Ms. Aparajita Singh, instructed to appear in CWJC No. 5542 of 2023, led the arguments on behalf of the petitioners. Referring to Annexure- P/1 notification dated 06.06.2022, which initiated the caste survey and the instructions issued from the Principal Secretary to the District Collectors, followed up with directions from the District Collectors to the Block Development Officers (Annexure- P/2 and P/3 respectively) and the guidelines issued through Annexue-P/4 notification, the learned Senior Counsel raised objections specifically regarding the queries raised under the three heads of religion, caste and monthly income. Reliance was placed on K.S. Puttasw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top