ASHUTOSH KUMAR, NANI TAGIA
Md. Amzad @ Amzad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Ashutosh Kumar, J.—We have heard Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned Advocate for the sole appellant and Mr. Satya Narayan Prasad, learned APP for the State.
2. The appellant stands convicted under Sections 376, 2(m), 376 (A) and 302 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, vide judgment dated 27.07.2017 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Purnea in Special POCSO Case No. 24 of 2017, arising out of Kasba P.S. Case No. 53 of 2017.
3. The appellant has been sentenced vide order dated 31.07.2017 to undergo imprisonment for the remainder of his life and a fine of Rs. 25,000/- each for the offences under Sections 376(2)(m), 376(A) and 302 of the IPC. No separate sentence has been awarded under Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
4. A 17 year old girl was raped and killed at the hands of the appellant.
5. The report about the occurrence was lodged by her elder sister (P.W. 5), a 19 year old girl, who was practically a witness to the grisly crime. She had reported on 10.04.2017 at about 12 P.M. at her house that in the morning, the deceased had gone to attend to call of nature in the fields and she had also gone to the fields for the same purpo
Bachan Singh vs. Union of India
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Santosh Kumar Satish Bhushan Bariyar vs. State of Maharashtra
Shankar Kishanrao Khade vs. State of Maharashtra
Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra vs. State of Karnataka
Union of India vs V. Sriharan @ Murugan
Gopal Vinayak Godse vs. State of Maharashtra
Dalbir Singh vs. State of Punjab
Subash Chander vs. Krishan Lal
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ratan Singh
Manoj vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
For conviction under circumstantial evidence, the complete chain implicating guilt must exclude reasonable doubt of innocence.
(1) Constitutional guarantees of equality before law, protection of life and personal liberty, protection in respect of conviction, and protection against arrest and detention, do not expand into a c....
The imposition of the death penalty requires the statutory provision of special reasons, and a balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances must be conducted.
Capital punishment can only be imposed in 'rarest of rare' cases, and mitigating factors such as the age of the offender can influence commutation of death sentences.
(1) Evidence is only to be weighed and not to be counted – It is essentially, for prosecution to decide as to how many witnesses are to be examined to establish its case on any particular point.(2) D....
The court ruled that the death penalty is not warranted in this case, emphasizing the need for a balance between aggravating and mitigating circumstances, ultimately commuting the sentence to 30 year....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.