SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 478

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Chandeshwar Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh.
For the Resp. No.3 : M/s P.K. Shahi, A.G., Manish Dhari Singh.

Arun Kumar Jha, J.—Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Advocate General for respondent 2nd set/respondent no.3.

2. The instant petition has been filed by the defendant/petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 21.12.2023 passed by the learned District Judge, Gaya in Civil Miscellaneous (Arbitration) Case No. 139 of 2023 whereby and whereunder the learned District Judge, Gaya admitted the said miscellaneous case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in Civil Misc. (Arbitration) Case No. 139 of 2023, the arbitral award, passed by the Arbitrator-cum-Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya on 16.07.2022 in Arbitration Case No. 216 of 2021, directing the competent authority to amend the compensation award, is under challenge. Learned counsel further submits that the award was sent to the petitioner as well as the respondent 2nd set/respondent no.3 vide Letter No. 3165/legal dated 03.08.2022 through registered post. The petitioner received the copy of award within a week and it is presumed that by that time the respondent 2nd set/respondent no.3 must also have received the aw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top