SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1150

SANDEEP KUMAR
Domi Kamat – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Abha Singh.

Sandeep Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the State Mrs. Abha Singh.

2. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 27.03.2019 passed in S.Tr. (Excise) No. 464 of 2017 (447/2017) by Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Supaul in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 44 of 2017 by which the appellant has been held guilty for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibitiion and Excise Act, 2016 (Amendment Act, 2018) and convicted for five years imprisonment and Rupees One Lakh cost and further under Section 37(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amended Act 2018) and cost of Rs. 50,000/- has been imposed and upon non payment of fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and 50,000/-, the appellant will have to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months and three months respectively.

3. As per the prosecution case, one Satyendra Prasad Singh gave a written report to the Nirmali Police Station alleging therein that when the police was on patrol duty, they saw two persons coming on a motorcycle. Upon seeing the police, the person sitting on the back seat of the motorcycle fled away and the police, o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top