SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 9

PURNENDU SINGH
Raman Kumar @ Raman Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GA-13.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, learned AC to GA-13 for the State.

2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:—

"(i) To quash the order dated 19.04.2023 passed by the respondent no-03, the Director Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna Whereby the respondent no -03, the Director Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna directing the respondent no - 06, the District Education Officer, Purnia to initiate the departmental Proceeding against the petitioner Raman Kumar Singh within a week after receiving the letter. (annexure-P/14)

(ii) Further quash the order dated 10.05.2023 passed by Sri Shiv Nath Ra zak the respondent no - 06, the District Education Officer, Purnia whereby the respondent no - 06 the District Education Officer, Purnia charge sheeted the petitioner Raman Kumar Singh alleging that in four head a) Not handed over the Charge and disobey the order of department, b) Petitioner has been directed by letter no-328 dated 02.02.2023 to hand over charge within two days but it was disobeyed c) Due to k

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top