SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 909

PURNENDU SINGH
Navin Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Adv., Anil Kumar.
For the State : Mr.Fazle Karim, AC to SC-1.

Purnendu Singh, J.—

Re.: I.A. No. 01 of 2023

Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner by filing the present Interlocutory Application seeks amendment in Para-1 of the writ petition by adding additional relief as stated in Para-1 of the present interlocutory application.

2. Having considered the information contained in the interlocutory application and the grounds mentioned therein and the affidavit, I find that there are sufficient reason to allow the amendment of the prayer as prayed in Para-1 of the writ petition by adding additional relief as stated in Para-1 of the interlocutory application.

3. Office/petitioner is directed to take steps to amend Para-1 of the writ petition by adding additional relief as stated in Para-1 of the interlocutory application.

4. I.A. No. 01 of 2023 is allowed.

Re.: C.W.J.C. No. 9015 of 2023

5. Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Fazle Karim, learned AC to SC-1 for the State.

6. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:—

“(i) For issuance of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top