SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.
CWJC No. 546 of 2017
(7.4.2025)
Brij Nandan @ Siya Ram Yadav & Anr. ... Petitioners
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Janardan Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv., Jagdish Prasad Singh.
For the State : M/s Kameshwar Pd. Gupta, GP-10, Virendra Kuar, AC to GP-10.
For the Resp. No. 9 : Mr. Rantan Kumar.
For the Resp. No. 14 : M/s Abhay Shankar Singh, Barun Kumar Singh.

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ Petition – Maintainability – A person who raises a grievance, much show as to how he has suffered legal injury and in absence thereof, a stranger having no right whatsoever cannot be permitted to invoke writ jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 – Existence of legal right of a person, who complains of infraction of such right is foundation for exercise of jurisdiction by High Court under Article 226 – A person shall have no locus standi to file a writ petition if he is not personally affected by impugned order or his fundamental rights have neither been directly or substantially embodied nor is there any eminent danger of such rights being embodied – Relief under Article 226 of is based on existence of a right in favour of person invoking jurisdiction and exception to general rule is only in cases where writ applied for is a writ of habeas corpus or quo warranto or filed in public interest. (Para 18)

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ Petition – Maintainability – Cancellation of land selected earlier for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan – Petitioners have nowhere in writ petition made any statement as to how they have been personally effected by impugned order or as to what personal/legal injury has been caused to them – There is complete absence of any pleading in writ petition with regard to existence of any legal right which has been violated – Present writ petition is not maintainable at behest of writ petitioners and is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone – On merits of case, there is no violation of guidelines, issued by Panchayati Raj Department – District Magistrate has granted approval for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan – Even on merits, writ petitioners do not have any case – Huge sums of money has already been invested and construction work of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan in question is at an advanced stage – Stalling the same at this juncture would not only cause further delay in construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan but will also result in huge cost escalation of project apart from wastage of huge sums of public money and loss to State exchequer – Writ Petition dismissed. (Paras 20 to 24)

CAV JUDGMENT

Date: 07-04-2025 

 – The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the decision of Aam Sabha dated 02.08.2016, issued under the signature of the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Pakahi- Jhajhara, whereby and whereunder the land selected earlier for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan has been cancelled and a decision has been taken unanimously to construct Panchyat Sarkar Bhawan at land situated at Mauza-Jhajhara, P.S. No. 261, appertaining to Khata No. 2 (old), Khesra No. 885 (old), corresponding to Khata No. 346 (new), Khesra No. 1019 (new) [hereinafter referred to as “Mauza-Jhajhara, Plot No. 1019”], ad-measuring 1 acre. The petitioners have further prayed for setting aside the order dated 06.12.2016, issued by the District Magistrate, Darbhanga, whereby and whereunder he has given approval for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at land situated at Mauza-Jhajhara, Plot No. 1019, admeasuring 1 acre, instead of the previous selected land situated at Mauza-Pakahi, appertaining to Khata No. 718, Khesra No. 1204 [hereinafter referred to as “Mauza- Pakahi, Plot No. 1204”]. Lastly, the petitioners have prayed for directing the Respondents to construct Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at the land situated at Mauza-Pakahi, appertaining to Khata No. 718, Khesra No. 1204.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioners are that there are six panchayats in Cluster No. 51 including Pakahi Jhajhara Gram Panchayat. The then Mukhiya of Pakahi Jhajhara Panchayat, vide application dated 21.9.2012 had requested the concerned Circle Officer to grant approval for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at the land situated at Mauza Pakahi, appertaining to Khata No. 718, Khesra No. 1204, ad-measuring 4 acres 37 decimals. Thereafter, the Anchal Amin had measured the land on 15.10.2012 and submitted a report along with the trace map as also had demarcated the land for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan. The Block Development Officer and Circle Officer had then inspected the land on 6.11.2012 and had submitted a report in the prescribed format. The Circle Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan i.e. the Respondent No. 7 had intimated the factual aspect of the matter pertaining to construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan to the District Panchayati Raj Officer, Darbhanga i.e. the Respondent No. 5, vide letter dt. 28.11.2012. The respondents had, after considering the entire facts and circumstances, accorded sanction for construction of Panchayat Sarkat Bhawan at Mauja-Pakahi and then the Executive Engineer, Department of Yojna and Development, Government of Bihar, had issued tender notice No. 2/14-15 for five works including construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at Pakahi at an estimated cost of Rs. 95,38,455/- and the time prescribed for completion of work was twelve months. Only one person, namely Gauri Shankar Yadav i.e. the Respondent No. 14 had submitted his bid, hence he was declared to be the successful bidder. Nonetheless, he delayed the construction of the aforesaid Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan since the Ex-Mukhiya and the persons having vested interest were trying to change the site of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan.

3. The Respondent Engineer-in-Chief, Local Area Engineering Organization, Department of Yojna and Development, Government of Bihar, had then granted approval for awarding tender to Sri Gauri Shankar Yadav for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at Kusheshwar Asthan, Pakahi-Jhajhara, Darbhanga, vide letter dated 11.05.2016. However, in the meantime, the newly elected Mukhiya had issued a letter, containing the unanimous decision of the Aam Sabha dated 02.08.2016, whereby and whereunder the land selected earlier for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan was cancelled and a decision was taken to construct the same at the land situated at Mauza-Jhajhara, Plot No. 1019, ad-measuring 1 acre. At this juncture, it has been pointed out that the said Plot No. 1019 belongs to the Middle School, Jhajhara, nonetheless the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top