SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 233

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Sudisht Rai @ Sudist Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Vijay Kumar Singh, Abhinav Shandilya.
For the Respondents: M/s Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3, P. N. Sharma, AC to AG.

Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. – This writ application has been preferred for the following reliefs: –

“(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of pre-mature release and release him in view of the provisions contained under clause (iii) (d) of Notification contained in Memo No. 3106 dated 10.12.2002 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 51 of 1989 arising out of Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 36 of 1985 wherein vide judgment and order dated 24.08.1990 the petitioner was convicted for life on the ground that now the petitioner had already attained the age of 68 years as also the petitioner had completed more than seven years of his physical incarceration.

(II) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for which the writ petitioner would be entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case. ”

Case of the Petitioner

2. Petitioner is a citizen of India who was made an accused in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 36 of 1985 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter in short ‘IPC’). The al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top