SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1343

SANDEEP KUMAR
Ashok Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ratnakar Pandey.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.G.

Sandeep Kumar, J.—Heard the parties.

2. By way of this writ application the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:—

(i) For Issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the decision of the State Remission Board dated 12.09.2023 so far it relates to the petitioner, whereby and whereunder the State Remission Board has been pleased to reject the proposal of the petitioner for his pre-mature release interalia on the ground that under clause (iv) (ka) and (kha) of notification No. 3106 dated 10.12.2002 the petitioner is not eligible for grant of pre-mature release.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release and release him in connection with Sessions Trial No. 55 of 2006 arising out of Fulwaria P.S. Case No. 1 of 2006 on the ground that now the petitioner has already completed more than 22 years of sentence with remission and more than 17 years of his physical incarceration, taking into consideration that the case of the petitioner has been covered under 1984 Policy prevailing at the relevant time of his conviction si

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top