SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
Rupesh Kumar, S/o Late Bipin Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India, Ministry of Railways represented through the Under Secretary, Railway Board New Delhi and ors. - Respondents
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1766 of 2023
Decided On : 25-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashish Giri, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, Advocate, Ms. Riya Giri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Avanish Kumar Singh, SPP, Mr. Ambar Narayan, Advocate, Mrs. Barkha, Advocate, Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Awadesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. CGC, Mr. Lokesh, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Verma, Advocate

The court held that prior approval for investigation under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is unnecessary in cases involving direct allegations of corrupt conduct by public officials.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 17A, and 19 - Allegations against railway officer regarding illegal gratification and preferential treatment to a private company in exchange for undue advantage. The petitioner challenged the CBI investigation on grounds of improper sanction under Section 17A - Investigation found substantial evidence against the petitioner, including bribe payments and telephone intercepts - The court held that prior approval for investigation was unnecessary given the nature of allegations, as they related to misconduct beyond the discharge of official duties. (Paras 5, 12, 32, 36)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Article 226 - The court affirmed that issues around the need for sanction and investigation legality could be assessed at trial, not through writ jurisdiction. (Paras 35, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an officer with East Central Railway, was alleged to have colluded with a private company for illegal benefits, receiving substantial bribes in exchange for preferential treatment. The CBI apprehended associated persons and initiated an investigation.

Findings of Court:
Despite the petitioner's arguments regarding lack of proper sanction, the investigation was deemed valid given the bribe-related activities confirmed.

Issues: The primary issues of law revolved around the sufficiency of evidence for charges, the necessity of prior sanction for investigation, and whether the allegations fell under the public duties of the officer.

Ratio Decidendi: The court distinguished that while the conduct of investigation generally mandates prior approval under Section 17A, in cases involving direct allegations of corruption such approval may not be necessary; hence, the investigation was upheld as valid.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. allegations of corruption involving railway officials. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on legality of sanction and due process. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's dismissal based on adherence to established legal principles. (Para 33 , 36)

JUDGMENT :

Bibek Chaudhuri, J.

1. The Petitioner is an officer of East Central Railway. On the allegation that the petitioner along with other officers and members and staffs of East Central Railway have illegal nexus with one Nawal Kishor Ladha, Director of Ms. Abha Agro Industries Private Limited having its office at Om Tower, 32 Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, 12th Floor, Kolkata – 700071 and the petitioner in collusion and conspiracy with said company and other officers and members of staff of East Central Railway used to give undue advantage to the said company by reservation of out of turn railway rakes accepting illegal gratification. The said information was received by the CBI officers, Patna. It was alleged that the said Nawal Kishore Ladha as and when required pursued his emergent requirement of railway rakes and other allied issues to the petitioner along with one Sanjay Kumar, Rupesh Kumar (petitioner), Sachin Mishra and others being officers and employees of East Central Railways and in lieu of making railway rakes available under emergent circumstances, the petitioner had received Rs. 4 lakhs on 24th of May, 2022 and Rs. 6 lakhs on 27th of June, 2022. The CBI got the information that on 16th of July, 2022, Nawal Kishore Ladha instructed his brother Manoj Ladha to send Rs. 10 lakhs to be paid to different persons as illegal gratification at Patna, Samastipur and Hajipur. On 30th of July, 2022, Nawal Kishore Ladha again directed Manoj Ladha and Bajrang Ladha to send Rs. 23.5 lakhs to Patna, Sonepur and Samastipur in different envelopes, each containing Rs. 6 lakhs, Rs. 6 lakhs, Rs. 5 lakhs, Rs. 3 lakhs, Rs. 2.75 lakhs, Rs. 50,000/- and Rs. 25,000/- to be delivered to different officers of East Central Railway. Manoj Ladha told his driver Manoj Saha to go to Patna with the aforesaid money, contained in different envelopes in a packet to deliver the same to different persons including Rupesh Kumar (petitioner).

2. In order to work out the said information, the CBI constituted a trap time, comprising of the officers of CBI and two independent witnesses namely, Afsar Aquil and Jai Shankar Prasad Singh. After pre-trap brief, the trap team conducted vigil on Patliputra Rail Parisar, Digha, Patna from 10 a.m. on 31st of July, 2022. At about 12.30 pm., one XUV500 car, bearing Registration No. WB60S0222 reached Patliputra Rail Parisar. The driver got down from the car with a gray coloured bag and entered into the premises of Patliputra Rail Parisar, Digha Patna. The trap team was awaiting outside and as soon as Manoj Kumar Saha came out of the premises, he was apprehended outside the gate. On being asked, he disclosed that he delivered bribe money of Rs. 6 lakhs in a yellow bag to Sanjay Kumar CFTM at his residential premises located at Flat No. 502 B, 5th Floor, B Block Patliputra Railway Parisar, Digha Patna. The trap team immediately went to the residence of Sanjay Kumar and apprehended him on the charge of accepting Rs. 6 lakhs as bribe. The said Sanjay Kumar admitted acceptance of money and handed over the said yellow bag to the CBI officer Incharge of trap. He was arrested and the money was seized under proper seizure list at the spot. A case was instituted against Sanjay Kumar under Section 7 read with Section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and CBI submitted charge- sheet against him on 29th of September, 2022 while keeping further investigation open. Subsequently thereto, a supplementary charge-sheet was filed on 30th of May, 2023. The CBI also obtained sanction for prosecution vide order, dated 12th of July, 2023 and it was submitted before the trial court. In the charge-sheet, it is also stated that after apprehending Sanjay Kumar, the gray coloured bag of Manoj Kumar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top