MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, NANI TAGIA
Dharmendra Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Mohit Kumar Shah, J. – The present appeal has been preferred under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Cr.P.C.’) against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.05.2017 and 23.05.2017 respectively, passed by the learned Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge-1st, Gaya (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned Trial Judge’) in Sessions Trial No.601 of 2013 (S.J.)/31 of 2017 (arising out of Paraiya P.S. case No.89 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No.4159 of 2012), whereby and whereunder the learned Trial Judge has convicted the appellant No.1 under Section 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘I.P.C.’) and the appellant No.2 under Section 120(B) of the I.P.C. By the said order dated 23.05.2017, the learned Trial Judge has sentenced the appellant No.1 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 of the I.P.C. with fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default thereof, he has been directed to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. The learned Trial Judge has further sentenced both the appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 12
Munshi Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Anant Gopal Sheorey vs. State of Bombay
State of Bihar vs. Jhari Sharma
Sahadevan vs. State of Tamil Nadu
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.