Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. BAJANTHRI, CJ., ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., through its Authorised representative Anand Ashesh, S/o. Surendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Narayan Mithila, University, through its Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ for mandamus to disclose tender documents. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of non-compliance with tender conditions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. claims of bias and unresponsive tender committee. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments supporting compliance with tender norms. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. judicial review limitations in tender matters. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. final conclusion to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J.
Heard the parties
2. The petitioner in the present writ application has prayed for following reliefs:
“(i) To issue a rule NISI in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to disclose all the relevant documents including the bid documents submitted by respondent no. 4 being one of the bidder who has been declared successful bidder after opening of the price bid as ‘L1’ in violation of the terms and conditions of the tender documents/ Notice Inviting Tender (NIT).
(ii) To issue a rule NISI in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disclose the decision of the tender committee declaring the respondent no. 4 after opening of the financial bid as ‘L1’
(iii) To issue a rule NISI in the nature of writ of certiorari to quash and c
A bid not meeting the lowest statutory requirements due to material non-compliance does not invalidate the tender if the overall statutory obligations are met, allowing a degree of flexibility in com....
Tender conditions mandating compliance with minimum wage must strictly be followed; non-compliance voids bid eligibility.
The court ruled that bids below the justified rate are non-responsive, emphasizing judicial respect for expert evaluations in tendering processes.
The court upheld the validity of the tendering authority's criteria, emphasizing that terms are not subject to judicial review unless proven arbitrary or unreasonable.
District Collector is not empowered to consider the aspect of alteration of any route or alignment except to remove difficulties faced by the licensee. As a result of this, even the request of altern....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
